Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Clinical TrialThe effects of systolic arterial blood pressure variations on postoperative nausea and vomiting.
In this clinical study, we tested the hypothesis that a marked systolic blood pressure decrease >35% (DeltaSBP >35%) from preanesthetic baseline during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia is associated with more postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). In 300 ASA physical status I and II women undergoing elective gynecological surgery with general anesthesia, the maximum DeltaSBP during the induction as well as maintenance of general anesthesia were calculated. Observers blinded to hemodynamic variables assessed the incidence of PONV. The overall incidence of nausea (visual analog scale >4) and vomiting within the immediate observation period (0-2 h) was 39% and 25%, respectively. Frequency of nausea and vomiting in the late observation period was 21% and 9%, respectively. Women with a DeltaSBP >35% during the induction of anesthesia suffered from a more frequent incidence of PONV within the immediate (57% versus 35% and 41% versus 22%, respectively; P < 0.01) and within the late observation period (33% versus 18% and 19% versus 7%, respectively; P < or = 0.01). In women with a DeltaSBP >35% during maintenance of anesthesia, a more frequent incidence of nausea within the immediate observation period (53% versus 36%; P < 0.05) was found. We conclude that a maximum DeltaSBP >35% during the anesthetic induction is associated with an increased incidence of PONV after gynecological surgery during general anesthesia. ⋯ A prospective clinical investigation revealed that a marked systolic blood pressure decrease >35% (DeltaSBP >35%) during the induction of general anesthesia is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The association between a DeltaSBP >35% during maintenance of general anesthesia and PONV is less pronounced.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Preoperative factors associated with postoperative change in confusion assessment method score in hip fracture patients.
Postoperative delirium is a major problem in elderly patients undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture. It is imperative to identify potentially treatable preoperative factors associated with the onset of postoperative delirium to optimize outcome. We sought to determine what preoperative variables are associated with postoperative delirium in geriatric patients undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture. In a prospective, IRB-approved study, patients admitted to the geriatric hip fracture service were examined daily in the hospital for the occurrence of postoperative delirium. All patients with a preoperative diagnosis of dementia or delirium were eliminated. A positive confusion assessment method score ([+]CAM) was used to determine the presence of postoperative delirium during the acute hospital stay. To determine the association between preoperative variables (demographics, laboratory values, and comorbidities) and postoperative (+)CAM scores, chi(2) and logistic regression analysis were performed with calculation for the odds ratios (OR). One-hundred-sixty-eight patients (72% women) were included in the analysis. Twenty-eight percent (n = 47) of patients had a (+)CAM score. Three variables were significant predictors of a (+)CAM score: (a) normal white blood cell count (OR, 2.2), (b) abnormal serum sodium (OR, 2.4); and (c) ASA physical status >II (OR, 11.3). The results suggest that preoperative medical conditions (abnormal serum sodium and ASA physical status >II) and an inability to mount a stress response (normal white blood cell count) may influence the patient's postoperative mental status. In particular, two of the risk factors we identified may be amenable to therapy and are abnormal serum sodium and lack of an increase in white blood cell count during the stress of trauma and surgery. ⋯ This prospective study investigated preoperative variables that are predictive of postoperative delirium in geriatric patients undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture. The results suggest that the patient's preoperative medical condition and inability to mount a stress response influence postoperative delirium.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Acute vision impairment: does it affect an anesthesiologist's ability to intubate the trachea?
The result of impaired vision on an anesthesiologist's ability to intubate the trachea is unknown. We studied 12 attending staff anesthesiologists as they intubated 2 anesthesia mannequins (A and B) under 6 conditions. The conditions were: 1) usual vision, 2) central-vision loss with 20/500 bilaterally and a 24 degrees central scotoma, 3) peripheral-field loss with 20/20 bilaterally and a 7 degrees visual field, 4) peripheral-field loss with 20/20 bilaterally and a 3.5 degrees visual field, 5) central-vision loss with 20/200 bilaterally and a 12 degrees central scotoma, and 6) right eye ocular media opacity and 20/70 left eye usual acuity. The time to intubation was recorded by stopwatch from gripping the laryngoscope until the anesthesiologist signaled that the endotracheal tube was properly placed in the trachea. The mean +/- SD times to intubation for Mannequins A and B were 16.0 +/- 3.3, 31.9 +/- 10.4, 26.4 +/- 9.0, 26.4 +/- 7.7, 22.4 +/- 5.1, 25.5 +/- 16.9 and 16.6 +/- 6.6, 26.9 +/- 10.0, 21.4 +/- 9.2, 21.4 +/- 5.8, 21.5 +/- 7.7, 17.7 +/- 5.1 s for the 6 conditions, respectively. Multiple analysis of variance revealed a highly significant difference for the time to successful intubation between the anesthesiologists' usual vision and the vision-impaired conditions. There was a significant improvement in time to successful intubation from the first to subsequent intubation attempts. There were also more esophageal intubations in the vision-impaired conditions. This implies that anesthesiologists who develop acute severe vision impairment might have more difficulty intubating the trachea, which could initiate more critical incidents. The results of this study cannot be applied to anesthesiologists with chronic vision impairment. ⋯ We found that acute severe vision impairment adversely affects the anesthesiologist's ability to intubate the trachea. This implies that anesthesiologists with acute onset of severe visual handicaps might have more difficulty intubating the trachea, which could initiate more critical incidents.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Central neuraxial blockade promotes external cephalic version success after a failed attempt.
External cephalic version (ECV) has been successfully used to decrease the fetal and maternal morbidity and costs of cesarean delivery. As there are limited data regarding the use of central neuraxial blockade in the setting of previously failed ECV attempts, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of spinal and epidural anesthesia in this setting. A retrospective review of all ECV attempts performed by a single experienced obstetrician between 1995 and 1999 was conducted. Standardized tocolytic and anesthetic regimens were used. A total of 77 patients underwent ECV attempts; of these, 37 (48%) were unsuccessful, 15 of which consented to further attempts with anesthesia. Neuraxial anesthesia was associated with frequent ECV success in both multiparous 4/4 (100%) and nulliparous 9/11 (82%) parturients. Overall 5/6 (83%) and 8/9 (89%) (P = NS) ECV attempts were successful with spinal and epidural anesthesia, respectively, with 2/5 (40%) and 6/8 (75%) (P = NS) resulting in vaginal deliveries. One successful ECV in the epidural group had an urgent cesarean delivery for persistent fetal bradycardia with good neonatal and maternal outcomes. We conclude central neuraxial anesthesia promotes successful ECV after previously failed ECV attempts. ⋯ Our retrospective analysis of central neuraxial techniques, both epidural and spinal anesthesia, noted a significant success rate in the setting of previously failed external cephalic version attempts.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2002
Case ReportsAn unusual presentation of end-tidal carbon dioxide after esophageal intubation.
This article discusses the inherent danger of general anesthesia and the need for a variety of tools to safely manage the airway.