Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2000
Comparative StudyDefining segments and phases of a time capnogram.
The division of a time capnogram into inspiratory and expiratory segments is arbitrary and results in the inability of a time capnogram to detect rebreathing instantaneously. Demarcation of a time capnogram into inspiratory and expiratory components using gas flow signals will not only facilitate prompt detection of rebreathing, but will also allow application of standardized and physiologically appropriate nomenclature for better understanding and interpretation of time capnograms. A Novametrix((R)) CO(2)-SMO plus respiratory profile monitor (Novametrix Medical Systems, Wallingford, CT) was used to obtain a simultaneous display of CO(2) and respiratory flow waveforms on a computer screen during spontaneous and controlled ventilation using a circle system with the inspiratory valve competent (no rebreathing) and with the valve displaced (rebreathing). Because the response time of the CO(2) analyzer was similar to the response time of the flow sensor, a comparison was made between the two waveforms to determine the inspiratory segment (Phase 0) and the expiratory segment of the time capnogram and its subdivisions (Phases I, II, and III). The end of expiration almost coincides with the downslope of the CO(2) waveform in the capnograms when there is no rebreathing. However, in the presence of rebreathing, the alveolar plateau is prolonged and includes a part of inspiration (Phase 0), in addition to the expiratory alveolar plateau (Phase III). ⋯ Presently, the division of a time capnogram into inspiratory and expiratory segments is arbitrary. Demarcation of a time capnogram into various components using the gas flow signals facilitates prompt detection of the cause of abnormal capnograms that can widen the scope of future clinical applications of time capnography.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparative study with oral nifedipine, intravenous nimodipine, and magnesium sulfate in postoperative analgesia.
We tested the ability of two L-type calcium channel blockers (nifedipine and nimodipine) and the N-methyl D-aspartate natural antagonist magnesium to decrease morphine requirements and pain in the postoperative period in 92 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. In a randomized, double-blinded study, patients were assigned to one of four groups. The control group received placebo. The nifedipine group received 60 mg of oral nifedipine. The magnesium group received an initial dose of 30 mg/kg followed by 10 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) of magnesium sulfate over 20 h. The nimodipine group received 30 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) of nimodipine over 20 h. Postoperative morphine consumption was assessed for 48 h. Pain at rest and pain on movement were assessed up to the fifth day postsurgery. There were no differences among groups in postoperative morphine consumption at 12 and 24 h. The nifedipine group consumed more morphine than the control and nimodipine groups during 24-48 h. Pain at rest scores were higher at 16 and 24 h in the nifedipine group than in the other three groups. Pain on movement scores were lower at 72 h in the nimodipine group than in the control and nifedipine groups. In conclusion, the perioperative application of oral nifedipine, IV nimodipine, or IV magnesium sulfate failed to decrease postoperative morphine requirements after colorectal surgery. ⋯ The increase of intracellular calcium plays a key role in spinal transmission of pain and in the establishment of central sensitization. We examined the effects of nifedipine, nimodipine, and magnesium sulfate in postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery. We found no differences in morphine consumption with the administration of each drug alone.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparative study between a calcium channel blocker (Nicardipine) and a combined alpha-beta-blocker (Labetalol) for the control of emergence hypertension during craniotomy for tumor surgery.
We compared the efficacy of the combination of enalaprilat/labetalol with that of enalaprilat/nicardipine to prevent emergence postcraniotomy hypertension. A prospective, randomized open labeled clinical trial was designed to compare the incidence of breakthrough hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 140 mm Hg) and adverse effects (hypotension, tachycardia, and bradycardia) between the two drug combinations. Secondarily, the effects of the drugs on SBP, mean blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were evaluated over the course of the study. ⋯ SBP was similarly controlled in both groups. There was a marginally smaller incidence of failures and adverse effects with labetalol. Blood pressure profiles were similar for both groups.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPostdural puncture headache: a randomized comparison of five spinal needles in obstetric patients.
This prospective, blinded, randomized study compares the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and the epidural blood patch (EBP) rate for five spinal needles when used in obstetric patients. One thousand two women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were recruited. We used two cutting needles: 26-gauge Atraucan and 25-gauge Quincke, and three pencil-point needles: 24-gauge Gertie Marx (GM), 24-gauge Sprotte, and 25-gauge Whitacre. ⋯ Neither the PDPH rate nor the EBP rates differed among the pencil-point needles. The cost of EBP must be taken into consideration when choosing a spinal needle. We conclude that pencil-point spinal needles should be used for subarachnoid anesthesia in obstetric patients.