Lancet
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock: a randomised trial.
International guidelines for management of septic shock recommend that dopamine or norepinephrine are preferable to epinephrine. However, no large comparative trial has yet been done. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine plus dobutamine (whenever needed) with those of epinephrine alone in septic shock. ⋯ There is no evidence for a difference in efficacy and safety between epinephrine alone and norepinephrine plus dobutamine for the management of septic shock.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Effect of celecoxib on restenosis after coronary angioplasty with a Taxus stent (COREA-TAXUS trial): an open-label randomised controlled study.
In-vitro and animal experiments have shown that the cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitor celecoxib can reduce formation of neointima within stents. We aimed to test whether celecoxib has similar effects in a clinical setting. ⋯ These data suggest that the adjunctive use of celecoxib for 6 months after stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease is safe and can reduce the need for revascularisation of the target lesion.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial.
Anticoagulants are more effective than antiplatelet agents at reducing stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, but whether this benefit outweighs the increased risk of bleeding in elderly patients is unknown. We assessed whether warfarin reduced risk of major stroke, arterial embolism, or other intracranial haemorrhage compared with aspirin in elderly patients. ⋯ These data support the use of anticoagulation therapy for people aged over 75 who have atrial fibrillation, unless there are contraindications or the patient decides that the benefits are not worth the inconvenience.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial.
Cervical cancer is the most common cancer among women in developing countries. We assessed the effect of screening using visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in a cluster randomised controlled trial in India. ⋯ VIA screening, in the presence of good training and sustained quality assurance, is an effective method to prevent cervical cancer in developing countries.