Lancet
-
There is disagreement on the usefulness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) due to conflicting results from individual trials. We did a meta-analysis on 28 controlled trials comprising 4959 subjects allocated to one of five CGA types and 4912 controls. Published data were supplemented with reanalysed data provided by the original investigators. ⋯ Combined odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of living at home at follow-up was 1.68 (1.17-2.41) for geriatric evaluation and management units, 1.49 (1.12-1.98) for hospital-home assessment services, and 1.20 (1.05-1.37) for home assessment services. Covariate analysis showed that programmes with control over medical recommendations and extended ambulatory follow-up were more likely to be effective. Our analysis suggests that CGA programmes linking geriatric evaluation with strong long-term management are effective for improving survival and function in older persons.
-
To assess the effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on respiratory tract infections and survival of patients treated in an intensive care unit, we carried out a meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing patients treated with selective decontamination with untreated controls. From eleven trials (1489 patients), differences between observed and expected respiratory tract infections and mortality were compared, and odds ratios (ORs) calculated. Analysis was done according to study design. ⋯ By contrast, the mortality benefit was less clear. Studies with historical controls and randomised trials showed that mortality was not significantly different between treatment and control patients. The evidence from these studies is at best consistent with a very limited effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on survival of patients in the intensive care unit, despite a clear preventive effect on the occurrence of respiratory tract infections.