Journal of neurosurgery
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Jan 2025
Meta AnalysisAnterior choroidal artery aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes and ischemic complications following surgical and endovascular treatment.
Anterior choroidal artery (AChA) aneurysms account for 2%-5% of all intracranial aneurysms. Treatment considerations include microsurgical clipping, flow diversion, or coiling with or without adjunctive devices. AChA aneurysms pose challenges in treatment due to the origination of the aneurysm from the origin or proximal segment of the AChA. The AChA is particularly susceptible to vasospasm and occlusion during treatment with devastating neurological deficits, including hemiparesis, hemianesthesia, lethargy, neglect, and hemianopia. In this study, the authors performed a meta-analysis to quantify the outcomes and complication rates across treatment modalities for AChA aneurysms and to identify risk factors reported in the literature. ⋯ Flow diversion showed significantly lower total and ischemic complications and improved outcomes compared to clipping and coiling. There may be differences in outcomes between treatment types, especially when considering the varied patient presentations that guide treatment selection.
-
Journal of neurosurgery · Jan 2025
Meta Analysis Comparative StudyComparing surgical clipping with endovascular treatment for unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.
Unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm (uMCAA) has traditionally been treated with open surgical clipping (SC). Endovascular treatments (EVTs) were designed to reduce surgical risks in these cases. Nevertheless, despite its potential benefits, many surgeons favor SC for uMCAA. This updated meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety, efficacy, and clinical outcomes of SC and EVT for uMCAA. ⋯ This systematic review and meta-analysis identified a lower likelihood of complete occlusion at last follow-up and lower likelihood of good clinical outcomes in patients treated with EVT when compared with SC. Furthermore, a higher likelihood of minor complications was identified in patients who underwent EVT when compared with SC. The findings reinforce that, based on the currently available data, SC should be considered the primary approach for treating uMCAA. However, EVT is an evolving approach, and this study's findings represent a synthesis of observational studies. Randomized trials are warranted to elucidate which approach should be the mainstay for uMCAA and to identify the nuances that determine whether SC or EVT is more or less indicated for addressing uMCAA with consideration of the individuality of each patient and aneurysm.