Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction.
Patient self-reports are the primary method for capturing the experience of pain, and diaries are often used to collect patient self-reports. This study was designed to determine if momentary monitoring of pain with an electronic diary affected pain levels over time, if it affected weekly recall of pain, and if daily sampling density affected compliance rates and patients' reactions to the study. ⋯ Compliance with the electronic diary protocol was 94% or better, and was not related to sampling density. Patients reported little difficulty with the diary procedures and were not unduly burdened by the protocol.
-
Comparative Study
Sensory and autonomic function in the hands of patients with non-specific arm pain (NSAP) and asymptomatic office workers.
Chronic pain in the upper limb associated with repetitive movements of the arm and hand is often seen in patients in the absence of specific pathology such as epicondylitis, carpal tunnel syndrome and tenosynovitis. This condition has been given many names and will be referred to here as non-specific arm pain (NSAP). Previous work has shown elevated vibration thresholds and reduced flare suggesting a neuropathic cause for this condition. ⋯ Over the median innervated area on the hand, vibration threshold was elevated by 47% in the patients and by 21% in the office workers. These results confirm previous findings showing reduced function associated with both small and large sensory fibres in the NSAP patients and additionally, for the first time, demonstrate a functional change related to sympathetic fibres. Office workers demonstrate a similar but smaller trend for reduced nerve function associated with both small and large sensory fibre function, but had no change in the sympathetic reflex.
-
Using a model of visceral nociception, we examined whether cholecystokinin (CCK) acts as an anti-opioid peptide in the rat rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). Because such interaction may be affected by inflammation, rats with and without inflamed colons were studied. The visceromotor response to noxious colorectal distension (CRD), quantified electromyographically, was recorded before and after intra-RVM administration of CCK, CCK receptor antagonists, and morphine. ⋯ Intra-RVM CCK-8 peptide enhanced responses to CRD in intracolonic vehicle-treated, but not TNBS-treated rats. Intra-RVM naloxone was without effect in intracolonic vehicle-or TNBS-treated rats, suggesting an absence of tonic opioid activity in RVM. These results document a CCK-opioid interaction in RVM, suggesting that colon inflammation leads to tonic activity at CCK(B) receptors in RVM.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Double-blind evaluation of short-term analgesic efficacy of orally administered dexketoprofen trometamol and ketorolac in bone cancer pain.
The analgesic efficacy and safety of dexketoprofen trometamol (the active enantiomer of the racemic compound ketoprofen) (25mg q.i.d.) vs. ketorolac (10mg q.i.d.) was assessed in 115 patients with bone cancer pain included in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. A level of >/=40 mm on the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) and >/=10 in the pain rating index were required for inclusion. At the end of treatment on day 7 (+1 day), mean values of VAS were 32+/-24 mm for dexketoprofen and 40+/-30 mm for ketorolac (P=0.12) but the pain rating index was significantly lower in patients given dexketoprofen (8.5+/-2.3 vs. 9.7+/-2.9, P=0.04). ⋯ Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16% of patients given dexketoprofen and in 24% given ketorolac. Serious adverse events occurred in 3.5% of patients from both groups but only one case of gastrointestinal hemorrhage was considered related to ketorolac. We conclude that dexketoprofen trometamol 25 mg q.i.d. oral route is a good analgesic therapy in the treatment of bone cancer pain, comparable to ketorolac 10 mg q.i.d., with a good tolerability profile.