Pain
-
Interpatient variability is frequently observed among individuals with chronic low back pain (cLBP). This review aimed at identifying phenotypic domains and characteristics that account for interpatient variability in cLBP. We searched MEDLINE ALL (through Ovid), Embase Classic and EMBASE (through Ovid), Scopus, and CINAHL Complete (through EBSCOhost) databases. ⋯ Despite these findings, our review showed that the evidence on pain phenotyping still requires further investigation. The assessment of the methodological quality revealed several limitations. We recommend adopting a standard methodology to enhance the generalizability of the results and the implementation of a comprehensive and feasible assessment framework to facilitate personalized treatments in clinical settings.
-
Pain with bladder filling remains an unexplained clinical presentation with limited treatment options. Here, we aim to establish the clinical significance of bladder filling pain using a standardized test and the associated neural signature. We studied individuals diagnosed with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) recruited as part of the multidisciplinary approach to the study of chronic pelvic pain (MAPP) study. ⋯ The UCPPS subtype with bladder-filling pain (BFP+) had altered morphology and increased functional activity in brain areas involved in sensory and pain processing. Bladder-filling pain positive status predicted increased symptom flare-ups and healthcare utilization over the subsequent 18 months when controlling for symptom severity and a self-reported history of bladder-filling pain. These results both highlight the importance of assessing bladder filling pain in heterogeneous populations and demonstrate that persistent bladder-filling pain profoundly affects the brain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Placebo effects contribute to brief online mindfulness interventions for chronic pain: results from an online randomized sham-controlled trial.
Mindfulness apps are becoming popular treatments for chronic pain and mental health, despite mixed evidence supporting their efficacy. Furthermore, it is unclear whether improvements in pain are due to mindfulness-specific effects or placebo effects because no trials have compared mindfulness against a sham control. The objective of this study was to compare mindfulness against 2 sham conditions with differing proximity to mindfulness to characterize the relative contributions of mindfulness-specific and nonspecific processes on chronic pain. ⋯ These findings suggest that improvements in chronic pain unpleasantness following a single session of online-delivered mindfulness meditation may be driven by placebo effects. Nonspecific treatment effects including placebo expectancy and pain catastrophizing may drive immediate pain attenuation rather than theorized mindfulness-specific processes themselves. Further research is needed to understand whether mindfulness-specific effects emerge after longer durations of online training.