International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
-
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Nov 2004
Concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy in routine management of cervical cancer: a report on patient compliance and acute toxicity.
To evaluate patient compliance and acute toxicity accompanying concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy (RT) in the routine management of cervical cancer. ⋯ Our results show that pelvic RT combined with weekly cisplatin in cervical cancer patients is accompanied by considerable acute toxicity. Furthermore, a number of patients were unable to comply with the treatment schedule owing to reasons unrelated to treatment toxicity. Thus, administration of the full chemotherapy dose may be difficult, although the delivery of planned RT was generally not compromised. Additional follow-up is needed to assess the late toxicity of combined modality treatment.
-
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Nov 2004
Comparative StudyClinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer.
In rectal cancer, combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy, either pre- or postoperatively, is an accepted treatment. Late small bowel (SB) toxicity is a feared side effect and limits radiation-dose escalation in a volume-dependent way. A planning strategy for intensity- modulated arc therapy (IMAT) was developed, and IMAT was clinically implemented with the aim to reduce the volume of SB irradiated at high doses and thus reduce SB toxicity. We report on the treatment plans of the first 7 patients, on the comparison of IMAT with conventional 3D planning (3D), and on the feasibility of IMAT delivery. ⋯ IMAT plans are deliverable within a 5-10-minute time slot, and result in a lower dose to the SB than 3D plans, without creating significant underdosages in the PTV. PGD showed that IMAT delivery is as accurate as 3D delivery.
-
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Nov 2004
Changes in temporal patterns of local failure after breast-conserving therapy and their prognostic implications.
The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate patterns and rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) over time based on the type of failure (true recurrence/marginal miss [TR/MM] vs. elsewhere [E]) and to compare these to rates of contralateral failure in women with Stages I/II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT). ⋯ The rates and patterns of IBTR vary with time and, after 5 years, approach the rates of development of a contralateral breast cancer. E failures are, overall, less frequent than TR/MM but contribute increasingly to the IBTR rate after 5 years. Time to tumor recurrence is the most reliable predictor of prognosis after IBTR.