Neuroscience
-
Single unmyelinated axons in the superficial branch of the peroneal nerve of human subjects were recorded (microneurography) and the response patterns during tonic pressure stimulation (14N at 30 mm(2); 120 s) were assessed using the previously described "marking technique". It was found that tonic pressure stimuli induced augmenting pain responses which were matched by the discharges of initially mechano-insensitive ("silent") C-units, whereas mechano- and heat-responsive "polymodal" C-nociceptors showed a response pattern incompatible with the stimulus-induced perceptions, namely strong initial excitation, followed by adaptation. Eighteen mechano- and heat-responsive "polymodal" C-fibers and 11 mechano-insensitive units were studied. ⋯ A second, identical pressure stimulus induced a stronger response in mechano-insensitive and a weaker response in mechano-responsive units. The stronger response, indicating sensitization, matched the more intense pain perception during the second pressure stimulus. It is concluded that mechano-insensitive C-nociceptors encode pressure-induced pain in human hairy skin and that they play an important role in static mechanical hyperalgesia.
-
In the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderately severe dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease, donepezil (E2020) has been introduced for the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity in the human brain. However, there is no morphological evidence as to how this chemical agent affects the acetylcholinesterase-positive structures in the various areas of the human and the rat CNS. This study demonstrates by histochemical means that donepezil exerts a dose-dependent inhibitory effect in vitro on acetylcholinesterase activity. ⋯ These histochemical results provide the first morphological evidence that, under in vitro circumstances, donepezil is not a general acetylcholinesterase inhibitor in the CNS, but rather selectively affects the different brain areas and, within these, the cholinoceptive and cholinergic structures. The acetylcholinesterase staining in the nerve fibers (innervating the intracerebral blood vessels of the human brain and the extracerebral blood vessels of the rat brain) and at the neuromuscular junction in the diaphragm and gastrocnemius muscle of rat, was also inhibited dose dependently by donepezil. It is concluded that donepezil may be a valuable tool with which to influence both the pre- and the postsynaptic acetylcholinesterase-positive structures in the human and rat central and peripheral nervous systems.
-
The role of endogenous opioid systems in the analgesic response to exogenous opiates remains controversial. We previously reported that mice lacking the peptide neurotransmitter beta-endorphin, although unable to produce opioid-mediated stress-induced antinociception, nevertheless displayed intact antinociception after systemic administration of the exogenous opiate morphine. Morphine administered by a peripheral route can activate opioid receptors in both the spinal cord and brain. ⋯ In contrast, the mutant mice were less sensitive to spinal (i.t.) injection of these same drugs. Quantitative receptor autoradiography revealed no differences between genotypes in the density of mu, delta, or kappa opioid receptor binding sites in either the spinal cord or pain-relevant supraspinal areas. Thus we report that the absence of a putative endogenous ligand for the mu-opioid receptor results in opposite changes in morphine sensitivity between discrete areas of the nervous system, which are not simply caused by changes in opioid receptor expression.
-
This Commentary compares the connections of the dopaminergic system with the striatum in rats and primates with respect to two levels of striatal organization: a tripartite functional (motor, associative and limbic) subdivision and a compartmental (patch/striosome-matrix) subdivision. The topography of other basal ganglia projections to the dopaminergic system with respect to their tripartite functional subdivision is also reviewed. This examination indicates that, in rats and primates, the following observations can be made. (1) The limbic striatum reciprocates its dopaminergic input and in addition innervates most of the dopaminergic neurons projecting to the associative and motor striatum, whereas the motor and associative striatum reciprocate only part of their dopaminergic input. ⋯ Major differences include the following. (1) In rats, neurons projecting to the motor and associative striatum reside in distinct regions, while in primates they are arranged in interdigitating clusters. (2) In rats, the terminal fields of projections arising from the motor and associative striatum are largely segregated, while in primates they are not. (3) In rats, patch- and matrix-projecting dopamine cells are organized in spatially, morphologically, histochemically and hodologically distinct ventral and dorsal tiers, while in primates there is no (bi)division of the dopaminergic system that results in two areas which have all the characteristics of the two tiers in rats. Based on the anatomical data and known dopamine cell physiology, we forward an hypothesis regarding the influence of the basal ganglia on dopamine cell activity which captures at least part of the complex interplay taking place within the substantia nigra between projections arising from the different basal ganglia nuclei. Finally, we incorporate the striatal connections with the dopaminergic system into an open-interconnected scheme of basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuitry.
-
While it has previously been assumed that mesolimbic dopamine neurons carry a reward signal, recent data from single-unit, microdialysis and voltammetry studies suggest that these neurons respond to a large category of salient and arousing events, including appetitive, aversive, high intensity, and novel stimuli. Elevations in dopamine release within mesolimbic, mesocortical and nigrostriatal target sites coincide with arousal, and the increase in dopamine activity within target sites modulates a number of behavioral functions. However, because dopamine neurons respond to a category of salient events that extend beyond that of reward stimuli, dopamine levels are not likely to code for the reward value of encountered events. The paper (i) examines evidence showing that dopamine neurons respond to salient and arousing change in environmental conditions, regardless of the motivational valence of that change, and (ii) asks how this might shape our thinking about the role of dopamine systems in goal-directed behavior.