Spine
-
Review
Inconsistencies between abstracts and manuscripts in published studies about lumbar spine surgery.
Systematic review. ⋯ Abstracts are discrepant with full manuscripts in a surprisingly high proportion of manuscripts. Authors, editors, and peer reviewers should strive to ensure that abstracts accurately represent the data in RCT manuscripts.
-
This was a prospective clinical validation study. ⋯ 3.
-
A prospective study on a series of consecutive patients. ⋯ DTI can be a useful tool to determine the pathological spinal cord levels in multilevel CSM. This information from orientation entropy-based DTI analysis, in addition to conventional MRI and clinical neurological assessment, should help spine surgeons in deciding the optimal surgical strategy.
-
Level IV, prospective case series. ⋯ This study demonstrated that lower educational attainment was associated with increased pain intensity and disability in patients with LSS, which was mediated by the coping mechanism, catastrophizing.
-
Retrospective case series of surgically treated patients with adult spine deformity (ASD). ⋯ The incidence of PJF among surgically treated patients with ASD was 1.4%. The most common type of PJF was 2N. Preoperative large sagittal vertical axis change and large amount of correction was a causative factor for spondylolisthesis above the UIV. After the revision surgery, further PJF was a commonly occurred event.