Spine
-
Meta Analysis
Spine Surgical Subspecialty and Its Effect on Patient Outcomes - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Systematic review and meta-analysis. ⋯ Although there is significant data heterogeneity, our meta-analysis found that neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons have similar readmission, complication, and reoperation rates regardless of the type of spine surgery performed.
-
In vitro biomechanical study. ⋯ Mechanical factors such as posture did not appreciably affect the incidence of endplate injury, but microinjury types were differently distributed between flexed and neutral postures. The duration of compression was shown to have an important role in the incidence of microinjury and lesion size.
-
Despite adequate correction, the pelvis may fail to readjust, deemed pelvic nonresponse (PNR). To assess alignment outcomes [PNR, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), postoperative cervical deformity (CD)] following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery utilizing different realignment strategies. ⋯ III.
-
A retrospective cohort study. ⋯ VBSO showed promising long-term results in terms of low revision rate, fast solid union, and effective segmental lordosis restoration when compared with other anterior reconstruction techniques.
-
A scoping review. ⋯ Only 6 studies have reported methods for documenting inflammation in the FJs. Studies varied in the precise tissues and phenomena included in the grading systems. However, the systems were generally reliable. Future studies should document the reliability of these methods when independent investigators are not involved in developing the classification schemes. Further work might combine one or more of these measures to establish a standard and reliable grading system for inflammatory changes in the FJs, including signal intensity within the joint, bone marrow edema, and soft-tissue inflammation.