The American journal of medicine
-
Review
Availability of large-scale evidence on specific harms from systematic reviews of randomized trials.
To assess how frequently systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials convey large-scale evidence on specific, well-defined adverse events. ⋯ Systematic reviews can convey useful large-scale information on adverse events. Acknowledging the importance and difficulties of studying harms, reporting of adverse effects must be improved in both randomized trials and systematic reviews.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effects of tai chi mind-body movement therapy on functional status and exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.
To examine the effects of a 12-week tai chi program on quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure. ⋯ Tai chi may be a beneficial adjunctive treatment that enhances quality of life and functional capacity in patients with chronic heart failure who are already receiving standard medical therapy.
-
Hospitalized patients commonly experience pain. We investigated the association between patients' reported use of recommended pain management practices and overall pain relief. ⋯ Patient reports that recommended pain management procedures had been used were associated with better self-reported pain relief among hospitalized patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial Retracted Publication
RETRACTED: Comparative efficacy of hormone replacement therapy, etidronate, calcitonin, alfacalcidol, and vitamin K in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: The Yamaguchi Osteoporosis Prevention Study.
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the Editor in Chief because of the stated concerns listed below. This article was accepted for publication by a previous editor and editorial board, at a time when submissions and documentation were in paper form, prior to the transition of The American Journal of Medicine to a digital submission and review process. ⋯ We have attempted to contact the authors regarding these concerns and received no response. We are therefore retracting this article since the evidence presented below strongly argues for scientific misconduct. The integrity of these publications is severely compromised by wide-ranging and serious concerns about governance, ethics, authorship, implausible study conduct, implausible workload, discrepant participant numbers and treatment groups, impossible data, implausible data, implausible outcome data, and discrepant methodology.