Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
-
We do not have good information on the incidence and prevalence of emergency conditions nor is there good research evidence on the best ways of meeting these. There are, however, some indicators for evaluating emergency services activities and we have a good framework from Donabedian for evaluation, and the important dimensions of quality specified by Maxwell. The range of emergency services covers primary care, community crisis care, ambulance services, hospital services (accident and emergency [A&E] department, inpatient, critical care), laboratory (blood supplies, tests), social services, and public health. ⋯ We need to specify a comprehensive, valid and easily collectable data set for assessing the quality of emergency services. This would include better ways of forecasting for early warning purposes. This could be done by monitoring the incidence of absenteeism, the sale of over-the-counter drugs, and the number of deaths in nursing homes.
-
There are numerous standards currently available that relate to accident and emergency medicine. Some of these relate to organizational structure; others are clinical and relate either to the process of care or to outcomes. Few, if any, deal explicitly with the dimensions of quality mentioned in recent white papers about the NHS. It is suggested, to maximize the effect standards have on care, that they should be developed for existing technologies not just for novel ones, rigorously developed and effectively disseminated and implemented, formally evaluated after their introduction and mutually compatible.
-
This paper examines some of the misapprehensions that have often underpinned the planning of accident and emergency services in the UK. Accident and emergency (A&E) is not a homogenous group of activities and the different components that make up the service should be planned separately. This planning needs to be accompanied by some significant redesign to meet growing patient expectations. In particular, there is a major challenge for services to offer local access in an environment in which acute care is increasingly centralized.
-
The maternal mortality rate was the first measure of quality in the obstetric services. It is a crude indicator but is still used for international comparisons. ⋯ The Royal College of Midwives and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists have jointly published standards of care in labour wards. Gynaecological standards are less well developed but should evolve as NHS audit improves.
-
Gross underfunding of the National Health Service in England and Wales results in too few beds and operating theatres and too few nurses and doctors. Thus, standards of surgical care, particularly for emergencies, are compromised. ⋯ For general surgery and trauma and orthopaedics this equates to 1 consultant for 30,000 population. Emergency surgical services require the presence on site of all the core specialties, including sufficient fully staffed intensive-care, high-dependency and coronary care beds to ensure their availability for emergency admissions together with 24-hour-staffed dedicated emergency operating theatres.