Neurosurgery
-
To develop guidelines for assessing shunt outcome in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). To date, the literature available on this topic has been marked by disparate definitions of clinical improvement, varying postoperative follow-up protocols and periods, and substantial differences in the postoperative management. Because specific criteria for defining clinical improvement are seldom reported, conclusions drawn about shunt outcome may be subjective. ⋯ Studies that have established fixed protocols for follow-up have shown that short- and long-term periods after shunting are determined by many factors. Whereas short-term results were more likely to be influenced by shunt-associated risks, long-term results were independent of factors inherent to the shunt procedure and shunt complications, i.e., death and morbidity related to concomitant cerebrovascular and vascular diseases. Studies have shown that beyond 1 year after surgery, these factors definitely influence the clinical effect of shunting, making the 1-year postshunt period a potential determinant of the shunt outcome. Guidelines for outcome assessment were developed on the basis of the available evidence and consensus of expert opinion.
-
To develop evidence-based guidelines for surgical management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH). Compared with the diagnostic phase, the surgical management of INPH has received less scientific attention. The quality of much of the literature concerning the surgical management has been limited by many factors. These include retrospective analysis, small patient numbers, analysis of a mixed NPH population, and sometimes a lack of detail as to what type of shunt system was used. Many earlier studies predated our current understanding of the hydrodynamics of cerebrospinal fluid shunts, and therefore, the conclusions drawn may no longer be valid. ⋯ The treatment of INPH should not be considered lightly, given the seriousness of the potential complications. Within these limitations and the available evidence, guidelines for surgical management were developed.
-
Endovascular techniques for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms are rapidly evolving. Modifications of more traditional coils have been introduced. Such modifications include newer coils coated with various polymers to increase both coil thrombogenicity and degree of aneurysm packing. ⋯ Endovascular alternatives to coil embolization, such as liquid embolic materials, also have been explored for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, with varying results. We summarize the rationale for use of these newer devices and early clinical experiences. Areas of current research and future directions of endovascular aneurysm treatment also are discussed.
-
The diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) remains unclear. Moreover, the value of supplementary tests to predict which patients would benefit from placement of a shunt has not been established. This report develops evidence-based guidelines for the use of supplementary tests as an aid in prognosis. ⋯ To date, a single standard for the prognostic evaluation of INPH patients is lacking. However, supplemental tests can increase predictive accuracy for prognosis to greater than 90%. Additional multicenter prospective randomized clinical trials are needed.
-
The precise incidence and prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is not known, and evidence-based clinical diagnostic criteria have not been developed previously. This report contains evidence-based guidelines for clinical diagnosis of INPH that are intended to facilitate future epidemiological studies of INPH, promote earlier and more accurate diagnosis, and ultimately improve treatment outcome. ⋯ It is recommended that INPH be classified into probable, possible, and unlikely categories. We hope that these criteria will be widely applied in clinical practice and will promote greater consistency in patient selection in future clinical investigations involving INPH.