Orthopedics
-
Patients undergoing treatment for infected hip and knee replacements often have significant blood loss and require allogeneic blood transfusions. In the setting of sepsis, traditional methods of blood management such as preoperative blood donations, cell savers, and reinfusion drains are contraindicated. Pharmacologic agents can minimize transfusion requirements by increasing erythropoiesis, or minimize perioperative blood loss. This article reviews the use of these agents in the management of patients with deep prosthetic hip and knee infections.
-
Interest is growing in blood conservation and avoidance of transfusion in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, especially in the field of joint replacement. Several methods have proven successful in reducing intraoperative blood loss, which can translate into lessened allogeneic and autologous transfusion requirements. Available techniques include acute normovolemic hemodilution, hypotensive anesthesia, intraoperative blood salvage, specialized cautery, topical hemostatic agents, and pharmacologic agents given in the perioperative period. The greatest potential benefit arises in operations with greater expected blood loss or in special situations such as in patients with religious issues, bilateral joint replacement, coagulation disorders, or significant preoperative anemia.
-
Blood management in orthopedic surgery is no longer an option; it is a requirement. The combination of patient desire to avoid transfusion, increasing evidence of multiple risks, decreasing blood supplies, and increasing costs mandate attention. This article addresses the balance of risk versus benefit in blood transfusion and presents a perioperative plan of blood management for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.
-
Aprotinin is a potent pharmacological agent that reduces bleeding. In current surgical practices, the rate of blood transfusions has decreased with the use of aprotinin. Recently, studies using aprotinin have been conducted in orthopedic surgery. ⋯ One adverse effect was the potential occurrence of an anaphylactoid reaction. Prophylactic administration of aprotinin should be considered in extensive spine surgery and in high-risk orthopedic operations. The decision to use aprotinin can be guided by a risk/benefit analysis.
-
Based on a literature review, this article evaluates the efficacy of aprotinin to limit blood transfusion during spine surgery. Most prospective studies confirm this effect. However, broader studies are required to evaluate adverse effects. ⋯ The cost of the medication has to be balanced with the cost of blood transfusion. A careful use of aprotinin allows a surgeon dealing with high-risk patients to avoid or limit the use of transfusions. For patients who are not high-risk, aprotinin should be avoided until other questions are answered.