Annals of emergency medicine
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Assessing hospital disaster preparedness: a comparison of an on-site survey, directly observed drill performance, and video analysis of teamwork.
There is currently no validated method for assessing hospital disaster preparedness. We determine the degree of correlation between the results of 3 methods for assessing hospital disaster preparedness: administration of an on-site survey, drill observation using a structured evaluation tool, and video analysis of team performance in the hospital incident command center. ⋯ The disparate results obtained from the 3 methods suggest that each measures distinct aspects of disaster preparedness, and perhaps no single method adequately characterizes overall hospital preparedness.
-
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC: Application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for patients with acute respiratory distress reduces the need for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Case series have demonstrated CPAP's feasibility in out-of-hospital settings. ⋯ WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE: Within the CPAP group, the rate of intubation was 30% less than the usual care group, and mortality was 20% lower. HOW THIS MIGHT CHANGE CLINICAL PRACTICE: Emergency medical services systems and their medical directors should consider making CPAP available as part of the treatment for out-of-hospital severe respiratory distress patients, particularly in systems with long transport times.
-
Evidence-based medical literature is lacking about the best methods to train health care providers in disaster response. We systematically review the recent literature to report whether training interventions in disaster preparedness improve knowledge and skills in disaster response. ⋯ The available evidence is insufficient to determine whether training interventions for health care providers are effective in improving knowledge and skills in disaster response.