Annals of emergency medicine
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
A randomized controlled trial of prochlorperazine versus metoclopramide for treatment of acute migraine.
We compare prochlorperazine 10 mg intravenously versus metoclopramide 20 mg intravenously for the emergency department (ED) treatment of acute migraine. ⋯ Either prochlorperazine 10 mg intravenously or metoclopramide 20 mg intravenously, combined with diphenhydramine 25 mg intravenously, is an efficacious treatment for ED patients with acute migraine. Three quarters of subjects in both arms would want the same medication for their next migraine.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
A comparison of observed versus documented physician assessment and treatment of pain: the physician record does not reflect the reality.
The Joint Commission requires "appropriate assessment" of patients presenting with painful conditions. Compliance is usually assessed through retrospective chart analysis. We investigate the discrepancy between observed physician pain assessment and that subsequently documented in the medical record. ⋯ Physicians almost always assess and treat patient pain but infrequently record those efforts. The patient's chart is a poor surrogate marker for pain assessment and care by emergency physicians and may not be suitable for use as a compliance assessment tool. Research methodology using retrospective chart analysis may be affected by this phenomenon, suggesting the potential for underestimation of patient pain assessment and treatment by emergency physicians.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Assessing hospital disaster preparedness: a comparison of an on-site survey, directly observed drill performance, and video analysis of teamwork.
There is currently no validated method for assessing hospital disaster preparedness. We determine the degree of correlation between the results of 3 methods for assessing hospital disaster preparedness: administration of an on-site survey, drill observation using a structured evaluation tool, and video analysis of team performance in the hospital incident command center. ⋯ The disparate results obtained from the 3 methods suggest that each measures distinct aspects of disaster preparedness, and perhaps no single method adequately characterizes overall hospital preparedness.
-
Multicenter Study
Assessment of the reliability of the Johns Hopkins/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality hospital disaster drill evaluation tool.
The Joint Commission requires hospitals to implement 2 disaster drills per year to test the response phase of their emergency management plans. Despite this requirement, there is no direct evidence that such drills improve disaster response. Furthermore, there is no generally accepted, validated tool to evaluate hospital performance during disaster drills. We characterize the internal and interrater reliability of a hospital disaster drill performance evaluation tool developed by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center, under contract from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). ⋯ We found a high degree of internal reliability in the AHRQ instrument's items, suggesting the underlying construct of hospital preparedness is valid. Conversely, we found substantial variability in interrater reliability, suggesting that the instrument needs revision or substantial user training, as well as verification of interrater reliability in a particular setting before use.
-
Multicenter Study
Cardiocerebral resuscitation improves neurologically intact survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
In an effort to improve neurologically normal survival of victims of cardiac arrest, a new out-of-hospital protocol was implemented by the emergency medical system medical directors in 2 south-central rural Wisconsin counties. The project was undertaken because the existing guidelines for care of such patients, despite their international scope and periodic updates, had not substantially improved survival rates for such patients during nearly 4 decades. ⋯ In adult patients with a witnessed cardiac arrest and an initially shockable rhythm, implementation of an out-of-hospital treatment protocol based on the principles of cardiocerebral resuscitation was associated with a dramatic improvement in neurologically intact survival.