Preventive medicine
-
Preventive medicine · Jul 2023
ReviewThe effectiveness of financial incentives for COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review.
Financial incentives are a controversial strategy for increasing vaccination. In this systematic review, we evaluated: 1) the effects of incentives on COVID-19 vaccinations; 2) whether effects differed based on study outcome, study design, incentive type and timing, or sample sociodemographic characteristics; and 3) the cost of incentives per additional vaccine administered. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Econlit up to March 2022 for terms related to COVID, vaccines, and financial incentives, and identified 38 peer-reviewed, quantitative studies. ⋯ Financial incentives likely increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake. While these increases appear to be small, they may be meaningful across populations. Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022316086 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022316086).
-
Preventive medicine · Jul 2023
ReviewThe effectiveness of financial incentives for COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review.
Financial incentives are a controversial strategy for increasing vaccination. In this systematic review, we evaluated: 1) the effects of incentives on COVID-19 vaccinations; 2) whether effects differed based on study outcome, study design, incentive type and timing, or sample sociodemographic characteristics; and 3) the cost of incentives per additional vaccine administered. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Econlit up to March 2022 for terms related to COVID, vaccines, and financial incentives, and identified 38 peer-reviewed, quantitative studies. ⋯ Financial incentives likely increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake. While these increases appear to be small, they may be meaningful across populations. Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022316086 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022316086).
-
Preventive medicine · Jul 2023
Review Meta AnalysisThe influence of overweight and obesity on participation in cervical cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide. The incidence of cervical cancer has decreased after implementation of cervical cancer screening, however, obese women have higher risk of cervical cancer than women of normal weight. This might be caused by a lower participation rate in cervical cancer screening. ⋯ In conclusion, obese women are less likely to participate in cervical cancers screening compared to women of normal weight. In addition, the likelihood of adherence to screening recommendations decreases with increasing obesity class. This stresses the need for targeted intervention to increase screening adherence for overweight and obese women.
-
Preventive medicine · Jul 2023
Review Meta AnalysisThe influence of overweight and obesity on participation in cervical cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide. The incidence of cervical cancer has decreased after implementation of cervical cancer screening, however, obese women have higher risk of cervical cancer than women of normal weight. This might be caused by a lower participation rate in cervical cancer screening. ⋯ In conclusion, obese women are less likely to participate in cervical cancers screening compared to women of normal weight. In addition, the likelihood of adherence to screening recommendations decreases with increasing obesity class. This stresses the need for targeted intervention to increase screening adherence for overweight and obese women.
-
Preventive medicine · Jul 2023
Review Meta AnalysisInterventions to increase colorectal cancer screening adherence in low-income settings within the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The USPS Task Force recommends screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in adults aged 45-75. Screening rates are low in underserved populations. We conducted a systematic review of interventions to increase CRC screening adherence in low-income settings in US. ⋯ Telephone reminders are slightly more effective than reminder letters (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02, 1.33), but there is no difference between personal or automated phone calls (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.74, 1.84). Mailed outreach and patient navigation are the most effective strategies to improve colorectal cancer screening in low-income populations. There was significant heterogeneity between studies, likely due to differences in intervention design, screening tests, and follow-up.