Thrombosis research
-
Plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) is considered to be the main inhibitor of fibrinolysis in sepsis. However, the contribution of TAFI to the inhibition of fibrinolysis in sepsis is currently unknown. ⋯ Although inhibition in sepsis is mediated by both, PAI-1 might be involved early in the sepsis process, whereas TAFI might be responsible for ongoing fibrinolysis inhibition in later stages of sepsis.
-
Aspirin overprescription is of some concern, especially in still-healthy individuals, and estimates of the magnitude of this problem are lacking. We evaluated the inappropriateness of aspirin prescription by primary care physicians in primary cardiovascular prevention. ⋯ A non-negligible proportion-up to 18%-of subjects in primary prevention is currently more likely to derive harm than benefit from inappropriate aspirin use. A wider use of Cardiovascular Risk Charts should guide primary care physicians in prescribing aspirin for primary prevention.
-
Thrombosis research · Jan 2006
Normal values for thrombelastography (ROTEM) and selected coagulation parameters in porcine blood.
The pig is a suitable animal model for researching blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. The present study therefore aimed to investigate in porcine blood the applicability of commercially available tests of coagulation and thrombelastography (ROTEM) and above all to determine normal values for coagulation parameters (e.g. prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT), fibrinogen, antithrombin III (AT III), D-dimers, protein C). ⋯ Normal values and reference intervals for porcine blood are given. As compared to the human reference intervals for the coagulation parameters investigated, porcine blood was found to be hypercoagulable.
-
Thrombosis research · Jan 2006
Review Comparative StudyOptimal INR for prevention of stroke and death in atrial fibrillation: a critical appraisal.
Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are at increased risk for systemic embolism, predominantly disabling stroke. To study how stroke and mortality rates vary with different degrees of anticoagulation reflected by the international normalised ratio (INR) we critically assess information from different sources. ⋯ 1. One randomised study showed a significantly lower risk of stroke for mean INR 2.4 compared to mean INR 1.3 combined with aspirin. Remaining studies found INRs of 2-2.5 to be as efficacious as higher anticoagulation intensities.2. Mortality as well as risk of admission to hospital or death due to diseases of the vessels of the brain followed U-shaped curves with minimum at INR 2.2 and 2.4, respectively. At high INR the risk increased 2.3 times per 1 unit increase of INR for death and 1.7 times for events in the vessels of the brain.3. The re-analysing of data of Hylek et al. indicated that there might be a substantial increase of the risk of intracranial hemorrhage when INR is increased from 2.5 to 4. We conclude that INRs in the interval 2.0--2.5 give the lowest risk of stroke and death in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
-
Thrombosis research · Jan 2006
Randomized Controlled TrialIndividualized dosing regimen for prothrombin complex concentrate more effective than standard treatment in the reversal of oral anticoagulant therapy: an open, prospective randomized controlled trial.
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (PCC) is indicated for the acute reversal of oral anticoagulation therapy. To compare the efficacy of a "standard" dosage of 20 ml PCC equivalent to about 500 IU factor IX (group A), and an "individualized" dosage based on a target-INR of 2.1 or 1.5, the initial-INR and the patient's body weight (group B), we performed an open, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. The in vivo response and in vivo recovery of factor II, VII, IX and X in these patients on oral anticoagulation was determined. ⋯ So, we conclude that for the acute reversal of oral anticoagulant therapy, an "individualized" dosage regimen of PCC based on the target-INR, the initial-INR, and body weight of the patient, is significantly more effective in reaching the target-INR than a "standard" dosage. The in vivo response and in vivo recovery found in this study was higher then in patients with isolated factor deficiencies. This suggests that the pharmacokinetics in patients on oral anticoagulants may be different.