Annales françaises d'anesthèsie et de rèanimation
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[A combination of sufentanil and 0.25% bupivacaine administered epidurally for obstetrical analgesia. Comparison with fentanyl and placebo].
The study reported was designed to determine whether 15 micrograms sufentanil would provide analgesia comparable in duration and quality with that given by 75 micrograms fentanyl, when associated with plain 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia for labour. Patients (n = 124) in labour and at full term were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 41) were given 12 ml of 0.25% plain bupivacaine with saline, group 2 (n = 41) 12 ml of 0.25% plain bupivacaine with 75 micrograms fentanyl and group 3 (n = 42) 12 ml of 0.25% plain bupivacaine with 15 micrograms sufentanil. 11 cases were excluded from the study (8 Caesarean sections, 3 technical failures). ⋯ The only side-effect seen with sufentanil and fentanyl was pruritus (group 2: 21.9%, p less than 0.05; group 3: 21.4%, p less than 0.05; group 1: 2.4%). These results showed that 15 micrograms sufentanil could replace 75 micrograms fentanyl for extradural pain relief of labour with plain 0.25% bupivacaine. However, the use of opioids with local anaesthetics would seem to be of interest only if labour is likely to be prolonged.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Comparison of nalbuphine and pentazocine in the treatment of postoperative pain by self-administration].
The side-effects of two opioid agonist-antagonists, nalbuphine and pentazocine, were assessed when used for patient-controlled postoperative analgesia. Forty ASA I or II patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to two equal groups. The anaesthetic technique was the same for all the patients: premedication with atropine and diazepam, induction with thiopentone and suxamethonium and maintenance with fentanyl, pancuronium, nitrous oxide and halothane. ⋯ The only parameters significantly different between the two groups were Pasys and PRP, being higher in the pentazocine group. There were no significant differences in the side-effects (drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, headache, amnesia, logorrhoea and urine retention). All patients in both groups were satisfied with this technique.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial[Comparison of blood pressure profiles with flunitrazepam/fentanyl/nitrous oxide vs cervical epidural anesthesia in surgery of the carotid artery].
A study was carried out to compare the evolution of arterial blood pressure during carotid endarterectomy performed under either general anaesthesia (GA) or cervical epidural anaesthesia (CEA). 20 patients were randomly assigned to two equal groups. In the CEA group, 15 ml of 0.375% bupivacaine and 150 micrograms fentanyl were injected into the epidural space at C7-D1 level. In the GA group, patients were anaesthetized with 0.2 mg.kg-1 flunitrazepam and 5 micrograms.kg-1 fentanyl; intubation was carried out using 0.08 mg.kg-1 vecuronium, and the patients were ventilated with a mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen (50% of each). ⋯ Per- or postoperative hypertension was defined as a rise in systolic arterial blood pressure (Pasys) over 180 mmHg for greater than 3 min; this was treated with 20 mg nifedipine intranasally (group CEA) or 100 micrograms fentanyl with 0.5 mg flunitrazepam with or without nifedipine (group GA). Per- or postoperative hypotension was defined as a fall in Pasys below 100 mmHg and or a 30% fall in mean arterial blood pressure for greater than 3 min; this was treated, in both groups, with an intravenous bolus of 3 mg ephedrine. Patients in group CEA experienced more frequent episodes of peroperative hypertension (8/2; p less than 0.02) and postoperative hypotension (5/1) than group GA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)