Annales françaises d'anesthèsie et de rèanimation
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Review Multicenter Study Clinical Trial[Anesthetics responsible for anaphylactic shock. A French multicenter study].
Combined allergological and anaesthetic consultations have been started in the last few years in eight French Teaching Hospitals so as to explore peranaesthetic anaphylactoid shocks. A survey was carried out in these centers in order to collect patients investigated with the same protocol, for the assessment of the incidence of anaphylaxis in France, as well as the involved drugs. Investigations were always carried out at least 6 to 8 weeks after the accident. ⋯ It would therefore seem mandatory to carry out after any anaphylactoid accident an assessment with sensitive and specific tests for anaphylaxis. Diagnosing anaphylaxis means that the involved drug should be used never again in that patient. Because muscle relaxants are by far the most involved drugs, anaesthetists should use them only when really required.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Premedication with intranasal midazolam in pediatric anesthesia].
To evaluate nasally administered midazolam 0.2 mg.kg-1 for preinduction of anaesthesia in paediatric patients the authors studied ASA 1 patients scheduled for elective surgery. Forty-five children, ages 3 to 126 months, were randomized in three groups: group D (n = 16) received diazepam 0.33 mg.kg-1 orally, group P (placebo) (n = 13) 0.04 ml.kg-1 normal saline via the nasal route; in group MDZ (n = 16) the children were given intranasal midazolam 0.3 mg.kg-1. The premedication was assessed on a 5-point sedation scale, modified to include the response to mask placement and the quality of the induction of general anaesthesia. ⋯ Vital signs did not change during the study period in any of the three groups. Intranasal midazolam was slightly more effective than oral diazepam. In children, it produces anxiolysis and sedation with rapid onset and is an attractive alternative to other routes for preanaesthetic medication.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Risk of thrombosis in prolonged catheterization of the radial artery: comparison of 2 types of catheters].
The thrombosis rate after long-term cannulation of the radial artery was assessed prospectively in 48 intensive care patients randomly assigned to groupe A (polyethylene Leader-Cath 115-09 catheter; n = 50, aged 55 +/- 20 years, 74% male patients) or groupe B (Teflon Viggo Floswitch 4441 catheter; n = 48, aged 58.6 +/- 16 years, 73% male patients). Bedside angiography was carried out with 10 to 15 ml Hexabrix before removal of the catheter. The two groups were similar with regard to anthropometric parameters, used drugs, pathological events during the stay in ICU, arterial cannulation technique and its duration. ⋯ The duration of arterial cannulation did not influence the rate of thrombosis. However it was higher in males of Group A than in those of Group B (p less than 0.01), when heparin was not given (p less than 0.05); when vaso-active drugs were used (p less than 0.05); and when the time required for cannula insertion was greater than 5 min (p less than 0.01). It is concluded that Teflon catheters are more biocompatible than polyethylene catheters.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Intubation in otorhinolaryngologic surgery: propofol versus propofol-suxamethonium].
This study was carried out to assess the conditions of intubation in head and neck surgery when using propofol alone or associated with suxamethonium. Sixty patients were randomly allocated in two groups of 30. Group I was given 3 mg.kg-1 propofol and Group II 3 mg.kg-1 propofol immediately followed by 1.5 mg.kg-1 suxamethonium. ⋯ Opening of the glottis was found to be better in group II than in group I (p less than 0.01) and bucking was more frequent in group I (p less than 0.01). Successful intubation was obtained after one attempt at a similar rate in the two groups. The haemodynamic variations consisted in a significant decrease of systolic blood pressure compared to the initial value but these variations were similar in the two groups at each time (2.3 and 5 min) from induction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Comparison of enoximone versus tobutamine in the treatment of low cardiac output after cardiac surgery].
Enoximone, a new cardiotonic agent not related to glycosides or catecholamines, has been suggested for treatment of low cardiac output syndromes occurring after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of the present study was to compare enoximone with dobutamine in the management of such cases. Twenty consecutive patients who had undergone cardiac surgery with CPB and who had a cardiac index (CI) less than 2.5 l.min-1.m-2, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure greater than 12 mmHg, and no renal failure, were randomly assigned to receive either enoximone (group E, n = 10) or dobutamine (group D, n = 10). ⋯ No other inotropic drug was used during the study period. The aim was to obtain an increase in CI greater than or equal to 30% at the end of the first hour of treatment. Excessive systemic hypotension with low SVR was treated with volume loading.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)