Annales françaises d'anesthèsie et de rèanimation
-
The assessment of postoperative pain and analgesic efficacy is essential as pain levels and morphine requirements are not predictable. Self-assessment with unidimensional methods (such as the visual analogue pain scale, the numerical rating scale and the verbal rating scale) is the rule for adults and children more than 5 years of age. The former is a validated method and the most accurate and reproducible scale. ⋯ Finally, morphine consumption with PCA is also an indirect pain assessment method. Postoperative pain should be assessed several times a day in every patient, starting in the recovery room and prolonged during hospital stay. Pain should be measured at rest and in dynamic conditions by the medical and paramedical team.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1998
Review[Benefit-risk and monitoring modalities of different techniques and methods of postoperative analgesia].
This review aimed to determine the benefits-risks ratio of postoperative analgesia. The various agents usually used for intravenous postoperative analgesia (paracetamol, NSAID's, opioids), and the techniques for postoperative analgesia (PCA, epidural, perinervous block) are analysed. The rules proposed for the monitoring of postoperative analgesia are considered.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jan 1998
Review[Postoperative locoregional analgesia in the adult: epidural and peripheral techniques. Indications, adverse effects and monitoring].
Regional analgesia is a very effective way to treat postoperative pain. Lumbar and thoracic epidural analgesia are well adapted to major abdominal and thoracic surgery. Nevertheless, respiratory side effects induced by opioids are potentially severe and an adequate monitoring is essential. ⋯ Benefits of postoperative regional analgesia on mortality and morbidity are not demonstrated. Medical and nursing staff and specialized units should improve quality of postoperative regional analgesia as well. General guidelines for the practice of regional anaesthesia must be closely followed.
-
The question as to whether the head and trunk of neurosurgery patients should be elevated remains controversial. This question is particularly important when intracranial hypertension is present. Head up position may have beneficial effects on intracranial pressure (ICP) via changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP), airway pressure, central venous pressure and cerebro spinal fluid displacement. ⋯ In most patients with intracranial hypertension, head and trunk elevation up to 30 degrees is useful in helping to decrease ICP, providing that a safe CPP of at least 70 mmHg or even 80 mmHg is maintained. Patients in poor haemodynamic conditions are best nursed flat. CPP is thus the most important factor in assessment and monitoring when considering head elevation in patients with increased ICP.