Annales françaises d'anesthèsie et de rèanimation
-
The management of a patient in post-traumatic haemorrhagic shock will meet different logics that will apply from the prehospital setting. This implies that the patient has beneficiated from a "Play and Run" prehospital strategy and was sent to a centre adapted to his clinical condition capable of treating all haemorrhagic lesions. ⋯ The treatment of these contributing factors will be associated to concepts of low-volume resuscitation and permissive hypotension into a strategy called "Damage Control Resuscitation". Thus, the objective in situation of haemorrhagic shock will be to not exceed a systolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg (in the absence of severe head trauma) until haemostasis is achieved.
-
Hemorrhage is the leading cause of death in trauma patients who arrive alive at hospital. This type of hemorrhage has a "coagulopathic" component, specific to major trauma and associated with poor outcomes. ⋯ However, early identification of coagulopathic patients requiring aggressive hemostatic resuscitation remains challenging, with an increasing role of point of care devices for hemostatic diagnosis and monitoring. Efforts have to be focused on the early diagnosis of coagulopathy for immediate delivery of blood products and coagulation factors to the right, accurately screened patients through pre-established protocols within the golden hour.
-
Survival after severe trauma may depend on a structured chain of care from the management at the scene of trauma to hospital care and rehabilitation. In the USA, the trauma system is organized according to a pre-hospital triage by paramedics to facilitate the admission of patients to tertiary trauma centres. In France, trauma patients are transported to the most suitable facility, according to the on-scene triage by an emergency physician. ⋯ This organization was based upon the interplay between the resources of each hospital participating to the network and the categorization of trauma severity at the scene. A regional registry allows the assessment of trauma system, which has included 3,690 severe trauma patients within the past 3 years. Bystanders, medical call dispatch centres, and interdisciplinary trauma team should form a structured and continuous chain of care to allocate each severe trauma patient to the best place of treatment.
-
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim · Jul 2013
ReviewThe initial management of severe trauma patients at hospital admission.
The initial management of trauma patient is a critical period aiming at: stabilizing the vital functions; following a rigorous injury assessment; defining a therapeutic strategy. This management has to be organized to minimize loss of time that would be deleterious for the patients outcome. Thus, before patient arrival, the trauma team alert should lead to the initiation of care procedures adapted to the announced severity of the patient. ⋯ A rapid trauma injury assessment aims not only at guiding resuscitation (chest drainage, pelvic contention, to define the mean arterial pressure goal) but also to decide a critical intervention in case of hemodynamic instability (laparotomy, thoracotomy, arterial embolisation). This initial assessment includes a chest and a pelvic X-ray, abdominal ultrasound (extended to the lung) and transcranial Doppler (TCD). The whole body scanner with administration of intravenous contrast material is the cornerstone of the injury assessment but can be done for patients stabilized after the initial resuscitation.
-
Update reviewing of chronic postsurgical pain. ⋯ Epidemiology of CPSP is more recognized as it is experienced by 10-50% of individuals after classical operations. CPSP can be severe in about 5 to 10% of these patients. CPSP is a major public health problem still rarely diagnosed and treated. Twenty percent of patients consulting in a pain clinic have a CPSP. The frequency of neuropathic pain is important but the difference in the proportion to CPSP falls between 6-68% and depend on the type of surgery. Clinical risk factors and physiopathology of CPSP are subject of wide development. Human studies allowed better understanding of the neurophysiological as well psychological aspect of the development of CPSP. Finally, the possibility of pharmacological prevention of CPSP seems to have increased in the past years. Nevertheless, there are still many questions that need to be answers about the problem. We should clearly define the optimal characteristics of clinical and experimental studies as this will allow the better understanding of the prevention of CPSP. Anesthesiologists play a crucial role in this development. They are involved in all of the stages of the operative care of patients and play a decisive role in the evaluation of the risk, the development of a preventive strategy, and in the early detection and treatment of CPSP.