The American journal of emergency medicine
-
Evidence suggests that any interruptions, including those of rescue breaths, during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have significant, detrimental effects on survival. The 2010 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation guidelines strongly emphasized on the importance of minimizing interruptions during chest compressions. However, those guidelines also stress the need for ventilations in the case of prolonged cardiac arrest (CA), and it is not at present clear at which point of CA the necessity of providing ventilations overcomes the hemodynamic compromise caused by chest compressions' interruption. ⋯ In this swine CA model, where defibrillation was first attempted at 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, uninterrupted chest compressions resulted in significantly higher survival rates and higher 24-hour neurologic scores, compared with standard 30:2 CPR.
-
The aim of the present study was to assess whether the combination of epinephrine, vasopressin, and nitroglycerin would improve initial resuscitation success, 24-hour survival, and neurologic outcome compared with epinephrine alone in a swine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest (CA). ⋯ In this porcine model of asphyxial CA, the addition of nitroglycerin to vasopressin and epinephrine maintained elevated coronary perfusion pressure during asphyxia CA and resulted in significantly better neurologic and histopathologic outcome in comparison with epinephrine alone.
-
Ventricular fibrillation (VF) and asphyxia account for most cardiac arrests but differ in cardiac arrest course, neurologic deficit, and myocardial damage. In VF resuscitation, cardiac mitochondria were known to be damaged via excess generation of reactive oxygen species. This study evaluated the difference of cardiac mitochondrial damages between VF and asphyxial cardiac arrests. ⋯ Both VF and asphyxial cardiac arrests caused myocardial injuries and mitochondrial damages. Asphyxial cardiac arrest presented more diffuse myocardial injuries and more severe mitochondrial damages than VF cardiac arrest.
-
Comparative Study
EZ-IO in the ED: an observational, prospective study comparing flow rates with proximal and distal tibia intraosseous access in adults.
Intraosseous (IO) access is an important alternative to conventional intravenous access when intravenous access is difficult. ⋯ Flow rates are significantly faster in the proximal tibia compared with the distal tibia. In addition, flow rates with pressure bags are significantly faster than without pressure bags in both groups.