Der Unfallchirurg
-
Intraoperative 3D imaging has a marked impact on the surgical treatment of articular fractures. In theory, insufficient reduction of fracture fragments and malpositioning of implants can be corrected in the same session so that unnecessary secondary imaging and revision surgery can be avoided. ⋯ Every fourth 3D scan seems to lead to a repositioning of fracture fragments or implants, despite unproven sensitivity and specificity. The interaction between diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic consequences needs exploration before any conclusions on the (additional) benefits of intraoperative 3D imaging can be drawn.
-
The results and immediate consequences of intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging in the treatment of AO classification type C fractures of the distal radius, the tibial head and the tibial pilon were analyzed and compared with published results on general intraoperative revision rates following intraoperative 3D-imaging. ⋯ Intraoperative revision rates following 3D-imaging increased with the severity of the injury pattern. Intraoperative 3D-imaging should be routinely used in the treatment of fractures of the tibial head, tibial pilon and even in comminuted distal radius fractures due to the high intraoperative revision rates found in the present study. Alternatively, a postoperative computed tomography (CT) control should be performed.
-
Intraoperative imaging during spinal interventions has experienced significant developments over the last two decades. By the introduction of flat screen detectors, 3D imaging has been made possible and easier and by developing compact and mobile systems computed tomography can even be used in the operating theater. ⋯ The advantages of intraoperative 3D imaging with a clear improvement of visualization for spinal surgeons and the certain control of materials at the end of the operation are obvious. Even the use of navigation has been greatly simplified and can therefore lead to an even greater precision and less radiation exposure. There are even more sophisticated developments, such as operation suites and intraoperative computed tomography but these are initially reserved for selected centers.
-
Three-dimensional (3D) imaging can enhance trauma care by allowing better evaluation of bony detail and implant position compared to conventional fluoroscopy or x‑ray. Intraoperative 3D imaging further improves this evaluation by allowing any necessary revisions to be made in the operating room prior to the patient emerging from anesthesia. ⋯ Improved image volume, resolution, and software capability have allowed surgeons to obtain high quality, wide field views of bony anatomy that can include the uninjured side as a comparison. In this paper, the evolution of intraoperative 3D imaging over the past 25 years is discussed.
-
Malreduction of tibial head fractures often leads to malalignment of the lower extremity, pain, limited range of motion and instability. The extent of the complaints and the degree of deformity requires an exact analysis and a standardized approach. True ligamentous instability should be distinguished from pseudoinstability of the joint. ⋯ A specific surgical approach is necessary, which allows adequate visualization, correct osteotomy and refixation of the fractured area of the tibial head. In the long-term course good clinical results are described for intra-articular osteotomies. If the joint is damaged to such an extent that it cannot be reconstructed or in cases of advanced posttraumatic osteoarthritis, total knee arthroplasty may be necessary; however, whenever possible and reasonable, anatomical reconstruction and preservation of the joint should be attempted.