Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Nov 1986
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA prospective randomised trial comparing spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric cinchocaine with general anaesthesia for lower limb vascular surgery.
One hundred and one patients were randomly allocated to have their peripheral vascular surgery performed under general anaesthesia (51 patients) or spinal anaesthesia (50 patients). Intraoperative haemodynamic changes were markedly different between the two groups with a higher incidence of hypotension in the spinal group (72% vs 31%) and a higher incidence of hypertension in the general anaesthesia group (22% vs 0%). Blood loss was significantly less in the spinal group (560, SD 340, ml vs 792, SD 440, ml). ⋯ Two patients in the spinal group had myocardial infarcts, both had been treated for bradycardia and hypotension intraoperatively, and one died. There was a significantly higher incidence of postoperative chest infection in the general anaesthesia group (33% vs 16%). There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of postoperative confusion, or lower limb amputation rate or need for further surgery prior to hospital discharge.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Nov 1986
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialComparative cutaneous histamine release by neuromuscular blocking agents.
Normal values of cutaneous wheal diameter following intradermal injection of six neuromuscular blocking drugs were determined. The relative cutaneous histamine-releasing ability of each drug was derived from calculated dose-response relationships. Equipotent neuromuscular blocking doses were found to have a cutaneous histamine releasing ability relative to pancuronium (= 1) of vecuronium 1.1: suxamethonium 1.7; alcuronium 5; atracurium 52; d-tubocurarine 172. A significant (P less than 0.001) variation was found between the dose-response slopes perhaps suggesting a variation in the mechanism of histamine release.