Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jan 2016
ReviewPitfalls in haemodynamic monitoring in the postoperative and critical care setting.
Haemodynamic monitoring is a vital part of daily practice in anaesthesia and intensive care. Although there is evidence to suggest that goal-directed therapy may improve outcomes in the perioperative period, which haemodynamic targets we should aim at to optimise patient outcomes remain elusive and controversial. This review highlights the pitfalls in commonly used haemodynamic targets, including arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output, central venous oxygen saturation and dynamic haemodynamic indices. ⋯ Many dynamic haemodynamic indices have been reported to predict fluid responsiveness, but they all have their own limitations. There is also insufficient evidence to support that giving fluid until the patient is no longer fluid responsive can improve patient-centred outcomes. With the exception in the context of preventing contrast-induced nephropathy, large randomised controlled studies suggest that excessive fluid treatment may prolong duration of mechanical ventilation without preventing acute kidney injury in the critically ill.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jan 2016
Characteristics of sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction using speckle-tracking echocardiography: a feasibility study.
Septic cardiomyopathy is commonly encountered in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. This study explores whether novel global and segmental echocardiographic markers of myocardial deformation, using two-dimensional speckle tracking, are associated with adverse sepsis outcomes. We conducted a retrospective observational feasibility study, at a tertiary care centre, of patients admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of sepsis who underwent an echocardiogram within the first week of sepsis diagnosis. ⋯ Speckle-tracking echocardiography can be performed feasibly in patients in sepsis. Global and segmental left ventricular deformation indices are associated with ejection fraction. Further studies need to evaluate the ability of these new indices to predict sepsis outcomes.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jan 2016
Comparative Study Observational StudyDay 3 versus Day 1 disseminated intravascular coagulation score among sepsis patients: a prospective observational study.
The role of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) has not been extensively studied in patients with sepsis. A prospective study was performed in a single university hospital. The incidences of DIC at day 1 (<24 hours post-sepsis diagnosis) and day 3 (48 to 72 hours) were investigated among patients with sepsis. ⋯ However, DIC scores did not give additional discriminative power to the existing prognostic scores in predicting mortality of patients with sepsis. In conclusion, the change in DIC score was significantly associated with hospital mortality. Patients with pneumonia sepsis had a lower incidence of DIC on day 1, despite their higher disease severity and mortality rate, compared to those with other sources of sepsis.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jan 2016
Intentions and barriers to research activities among Australian and New Zealand anaesthetists: a Survey.
A voluntary, anonymous, cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 997 Fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, using an electronic questionnaire. Details about their demographics, employment, research experience and barriers they had encountered, their perception about research and their future intentions to participate in research, were collected. The survey response rate was 24.6%. ⋯ In terms of barriers encountered during previous projects, 91% of the respondents cited methodological issues, which included complicated ethics approval processes, difficulty in coordinating teams or recruiting participants, non-compliant patients and difficulty in publishing. Sixty-three percent of those surveyed believed more exposure to research activities during training would increase the number of anaesthetists involved in research and scholarly activities. Through this survey, we have identified several areas that, if satisfactorily addressed, could enhance interest and participation in research amongst anaesthetists in Australia and New Zealand.