Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII
-
Cancer Immunol. Immunother. · Feb 2001
Comparative StudyEffects of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor administration on T cell proliferation and phagocyte cell-surface molecules during hematopoietic reconstitution after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.
Thirty-four ovarian and breast cancer patients received autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation after high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy and either granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating fictor (GM-CSF) in the immediate post-transplant period. The recovery of T cell functionality was monitored by a three-color flow-cytometric approach using carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester, a probe the fluorescence intensity of which halves at each round of cell replication, in conjunction with CD3 and CD25 monoclonal antibodies. There was no significant difference between the two treatments on days 12, 20, and 40, T cell proliferation always being considerably lower than that of control cultures from healthy donors. ⋯ Soon after transplantation (day 12), neutrophils from G-CSF-treated patients had a more elevated Fcgamma receptor I density and monocytes from GM-CSF-treated patients had a more elevated Fcgamma receptor II and MHC class II molecules density. The up-modulation of Fcgamma receptor II was maintained until day 40. Thus, administering G-CSF and GM-CSF in the post-transplant period affects T lymphocyte proliferation and phagocyte membrane molecules differently.