Current medical research and opinion
-
Review
Sting operations in biomedical publishing violate truthfulness and undermine trust in research.
Biomedical research cannot function without the trust of peers and society. The truthfulness of claims made by knowledge-producing agents, such as authors of research, is a prerequisite for their trustworthiness, and violations of truthfulness are rightly seen as a threat to the existence and validity of such research. While most reflection on the lack of truthfulness has focused on fake research, little attention has been paid to how sting operations and hoaxes arguably pose an equally great risk to the ethical integrity of publishing. ⋯ From a deontological perspective, we also argue that the reliance on anonymity in sting operations makes them just as bad, if not worse, than fake research. We advocate for critical scholarship as an alternative to hoaxes and sting operations to expose fake research, in order to promote truthfulness rather than violate it. Finally, we argue that journalists reporting on sting operations should insist less on their entertainment and sensationalist value, and focus more on their unethical nature.
-
Cancer remains a major global cause of death, posing significant treatment challenges. The interactions between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) are crucial in influencing tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and treatment response. There has been significant research and clinical interest in targeting the TME as a therapeutic approach in cancer, with advancements being made through drug development. ⋯ The findings from these studies indicated that patients using H1-antihistamines concomitantly with I/O agents experienced longer median overall survival (mOS), progression-free survival (mPFS), or improved survival compared to those who did not use antihistamines. Additionally, these trials differentiated between cationic and non-cationic H1-antihistamines, revealing that users of cationic antihistamines had overall better outcomes in terms of longer mOS and mPFS. The assessed trials were consistent in their comparisons of quantitative and qualitative, efficacy, and safety outcomes.
-
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), responsible for most diabetes cases recorded worldwide, increases the risk of chronic wounds and amputation. Patients with T2DM appear to be more susceptible to delayed wound healing due to their treatment adherence. This review explores the specifics of polypharmacy, side effects, possible drug interactions and the importance of medication adherence for therapeutic efficacy. ⋯ Managing chronic wounds represents a substantial portion of healthcare expenditures. Biofilm-associated infections are difficult for the immune system to treat and respond inconsistently to antibiotics as these infections are slow growing and persistent. Additionally, we emphasize the critical role pharmacists play in enhancing patient adherence and optimizing diabetes treatment by offering comprehensive coverage of drugs associated with problems related to pharmacological therapy in type 2 diabetes.
-
There remains considerable interest in the therapeutic use of combinations of levothyroxine (LT4) and triiodothyronine (liothyronine, T3) in the management of hypothyroidism, especially where hypothyroid-like symptoms persist on optimised LT4 monotherapy. This interest appears to be increasing, despite the lack of consistent identification of clinical benefit in people with hypothyroidism in randomised trials going back two decades. Guidelines support an individualised trial of addition of T3 to LT4 for symptomatic patients on optimised LT4. ⋯ This was despite the use of regimens with a lower ratio of LT4:T3 (usually 4-10:1) than recommended currently by clinical experts in the field. In addition, a real-world analysis of side-effects of a commercial LT4 + T3 treatment (LT4:T3 ratio 5:1) that were reported spontaneously to a pharmacovigilance database revealed a low rate of reports, both overall and with regard to symptoms possible reminiscent of thyrotoxicosis. Safety concerns regarding the possibility of iatrogenic thyrotoxicosis appear unlikely to limit the future guideline-driven therapeutic use of LT4:T3 combinations with a ratio of these ingredients of around 15:1.
-
Review
Pharmacology of chlorphenamine and pseudoephedrine use in the common cold: a narrative review.
The common cold is the most frequent upper respiratory viral infection. Although benign, it represents a high socioeconomic burden. Many over-the-counter drugs are available to manage the symptoms of this condition, with antihistamines and vasoconstrictors being the most widely used. ⋯ Chlorphenamine appears to exhibit a higher degree of efficacy in alleviating rhinorrhea and other specific cold symptoms compared to pseudoephedrine. Pharmacovigilance data and case report reviews showed that pseudoephedrine may induce a higher incidence of less common but potentially life-threatening adverse effects compared to chlorphenamine. We concluded that antihistamine drugs exhibit a more favorable benefit/risk profile than vasoconstrictors for treating symptomatic common colds.