Current medical research and opinion
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A double-blind, randomised comparative trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia: short-term results at two months.
To compare the efficacy and safety of the atypical antipsychotics amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. ⋯ Amisulpride and olanzapine show equivalent efficacy at 2 months in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. Amisulpride offers a significant advantage in preserving body weight.
-
The usual mode of communication with the specialist in the UK is a referral letter. Letters now primarily document the GPs' concerns for the patient and are no longer required to persuade the specialist to offer an appointment. The content of referral letters from GPs has failed to satisfy specialists responding to a series of surveys. Evidence suggests that GPs who improve their letters to specialists also refer more cases with significant pathology. ⋯ GPs only have very short consultations in which to address many and complex issues. Pre-referral assessment in colorectal cases includes intimate examination of the patient. Therefore the writing of the letter of referral is often postponed until long after the patient has left the GP's office. Some GPs do not believe the consultant reads the letter of referral. However, GPs are keen to provide best care and welcome feedback about the quality of their letters. They acknowledge the responsibility to communicate with colleagues effectively and have differing ideas about what constitutes an adequate referral letter.
-
Two nationwide surveys were carried out using an electronic poll of 2,000 GPs and postal questionnaires were sent to 30,000 patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Both surveys found a high level of gastro-intestinal (GI) side-effects in patients treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Almost every GP (97%) reported experience of patients suffering GI symptoms while on an NSAID, 38% reported patients who had been hospitalised and 4% reported patients who had died owing to NSAID-induced side-effects. ⋯ This mirrored the patients' perception, with 63% citing inadequate pain relief as their main reason for dissatisfaction with current painkillers compared to 17% who cited stomach upsets or irritation. Patient and GP appear to be united in their concern at the GI risks of NSAID treatment. In the light of this and recent data on the efficacy, safety profile and cost-effectiveness of COX-2 selective inhibitors, GPs should re-examine their medical management of OA.
-
Existing oral insulin secretagogues, sulphonylureas, are associated with hyperinsulinaemia, risk of hypoglycaemia and weight gain. Furthermore, they are not able to offer durable glycaemic control in patents with type 2 diabetes and are associated with progressive decline of beta-cell function. New insulin secretagogues offer an exciting opportunity. ⋯ Early data, both in monotherapy and in combination with metformin, show that it is an effective agent in terms of lowering HbA1c, has a low risk of hypoglycaemia and potentially less risk of significant weight gain. These characteristics mean that it may be the ideal agent to be used very early in the disease process, or even in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, in whom early-phase insulin response is already lost. However these concepts, at the present time, are unproven.
-
Comparative Study
Differences in lipid profiles of patients given rosiglitazone followed by pioglitazone.
To compare the effects of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone on patient lipid levels in a clinical practice setting, we retrospectively examined charts of 20 patients in our practice. The patients had been treated for type 2 diabetes for 3 or more months with rosiglitazone (4 mg b.i.d.) followed immediately by 3 or more months' treatment with pioglitazone (45 mg once daily). Glycaemic control was excellent and essentially equivalent during the two treatments. ⋯ One patient receiving rosiglitazone and one receiving pioglitazone developed oedema that resolved without therapy discontinuation. Liver enzyme levels and blood pressure were unaffected in this group of patients. Because patients with diabetes are at risk for coronary artery disease, physicians should consider each agent's effects on lipid levels when choosing a specific thiazolidinedione.