Journal of critical care
-
Journal of critical care · Dec 2022
Review Meta AnalysisWhat matters most to adults with a tracheostomy in ICU and the implications for clinical practice: a qualitative systematic review and metasynthesis.
Tracheostomy is a common surgical procedure in ICU. Whilst often life-saving, it can have important impacts on patients. Much of the literature on tracheostomy focuses on timing and technique of insertion, risk factors and complications. More knowledge of patient experience of tracheostomy in ICU is needed to support person-centred care. ⋯ Voice restoration should be given high priority in the management of adults with a tracheostomy in ICU. Staff training should focus on both technical skills and compassionate care to improve person-centred outcomes.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2022
Review Meta AnalysisSleep assessment in critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
To systematically review sleep evaluation, characterize sleep disruption, and explore effects of sleepdisruption on outcomes in adult ICU patients. ⋯ Sleep in critically ill patients is severely disturbed, and actigraphy and RCSQ seem reliable alternatives to PSG. Future studies should evaluate impact of sleep disruption on outcomes.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2022
Review Meta AnalysisVitamin C-based regimens for sepsis and septic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
to critically appraise and synthesize the evidence on the effects of vitamin C-based regimens for patients with sepsis or septic shock. ⋯ CRD42021251786.
-
Journal of critical care · Oct 2022
Review Meta AnalysisProphylactic acid suppressants in patients with primary neurologic injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Neurocritical care patients are at risk of stress-induced gastrointestinal ulceration. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in critically ill adults admitted with a primary neurologic injury. ⋯ In neurocritical care patients, the overall high or unclear risk of bias of individual trials, the low event rates, and modest sample sizes preclude strong clinical inferences about the utility of SUP.