Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Oral midazolam premedication for children with congenital cyanotic heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery: a comparative study.
To determine whether oral midazolam is a safe and effective alternative to our current standard premedication for children with cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD), 30 children aged 1-6 yr, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, were studied. The children were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I received oral midazolam 0.75 mg.kg-1 30 min before separation from their parents in the surgical waiting area, and Group II received oral or rectal pentobarbitone 2 mg.kg-1 at 90 min, and morphine 0.2 mg.kg-1 and atropine 0.02 mg.kg-1 im at 60 min before separation. ⋯ Intramuscular injection of morphine produced a transient decrease in mean SpO2 (from 84% to 76%) (P < 0.05) that did not occur after ingestion of oral midazolam. The results of this study indicate that oral midazolam is a safe and effective replacement for the standard premedication for children with CCHD undergoing cardiac surgery and avoids the decrease in SpO2 associated with im injections.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Propofol anaesthesia reduces early postoperative emesis after paediatric strabismus surgery.
Propofol anaesthesia may reduce postoperative emesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of emesis after propofol anaesthesia with and without nitrous oxide, compared with thiopentone and halothane anaesthesia, in hospital and up to 24 hr postoperatively, in outpatient paediatric patients after strabismus surgery. Seventy-five ASA class I or II, unpremedicated patients, aged 2-12 yr were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Thiopentone, 6.0 mg.kg-1 i.v. induction followed by halothane and N2O/O2 for maintenance (T/H); propofol for induction, followed by propofol and oxygen for maintenance (P/O2); and propofol for i.v. induction, followed by propofol infusion and N2O/O2 for maintenance (P/N2O). ⋯ Overall emesis after surgery was not different among the groups: T/H (48%), P/O2 (28%) and P/N2O (42%). The use of propofol anaesthesia with and without N2O decreased only early emesis. This supports the concept of a short-acting, specific antiemetic effect of propofol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Posture and the spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine in parturients using the combined spinal epidural technique.
This study was undertaken to analyze the effect of posture on the spread of hyperbaric bupivacaine in pregnant women using a combined spinal extradural technique, and to assess the quality of analgesia provided by 10 mg bupivacaine when using this technique. Fifty parturients undergoing elective Caesarean section under regional anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive 2.0 ml hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in either the sitting or left lateral position. Spinal injection was performed with a 27 gauge, 120 mm long spinal needle using a single space combined spinal extradural technique. ⋯ There was no difference between the two groups in neonatal outcome. Overall, the position of the patient during induction of spinal anaesthesia does influence the rate of onset of analgesia and motor blockade. Injection of 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine in the sitting position would not provide adequate analgesia for Caesarean section when using a single space combined spinal extradural technique.