Palliative medicine
-
Palliative medicine · May 2016
To explore the relationship between the use of midazolam and cessation of oral intake in the terminal phase of hospice inpatients: A retrospective case note review: Does midazolam affect oral intake in the dying?
Sedative drugs are used to improve comfort in dying patients but have been accused of shortening survival by reducing patients' ability to maintain nutrition and hydration. However, as part of the dying process, patients in the last days of life often have impaired conscious levels and an inability to maintain oral intake. ⋯ Mean oral intake was reduced 7 days prior to death and declined sequentially over subsequent days in both patient groups. More patients required midazolam as death approached and most patients received midazolam for less than 3 days. Mean doses of midazolam used were low. Patients in the midazolam group had lower oral intake than those in the control group, but this association does not indicate causation.
-
Palliative medicine · May 2016
Barriers and perceptions regarding code status discussion with families of critically ill patients in a tertiary care hospital of a developing country: A cross-sectional study.
In Asian societies including Pakistan, a complex background of illiteracy, different familial dynamics, lack of patient's autonomy, religious beliefs, and financial constraints give new dimensions to code status discussion. Barriers faced by physicians during code status discussion in these societies are largely unknown. ⋯ Family-related barriers are the most frequent roadblocks in the end-of-life care discussions for physicians in Pakistan. Strengthening communication skills of physicians and family education are the potential strategies to improve end-of-life care. Large multi-center studies are needed to better understand the barriers of code status discussion in developing countries.
-
Palliative medicine · May 2016
Observational StudyLongitudinal changes and predictors of prolonged grief for bereaved family caregivers over the first 2 years after the terminally ill cancer patient's death.
A significant minority of bereaved caregivers experience prolonged grief. However, few longitudinal studies have examined prolonged grief, especially in an Asian context. ⋯ Prolonged grief in bereavement diminished over time and was predicted by modifiable factors before, during, and after bereavement. To facilitate bereavement adjustment and avoid prolonged grief, healthcare professionals should develop and provide at-risk caregivers with effective interventions starting when patients are still alive to improve their dying experience, to facilitate preparedness for the patient's forthcoming death, to alleviate caregivers' preloss depressive symptoms, and to enhance their perceived postloss social support.
-
Palliative medicine · May 2016
ReviewDoes the use of specialist palliative care services modify the effect of socioeconomic status on place of death? A systematic review.
Cancer patients in lower socioeconomic groups are significantly less likely to die at home and experience more barriers to access to palliative care. It is unclear whether receiving palliative care may mediate the effect of socioeconomic status on place of death. ⋯ There is some evidence to suggest that use of specialist palliative care may modify the effect of socioeconomic status on place of death.
-
Palliative medicine · May 2016
Multicenter StudyPalliative Care Problem Severity Score: Reliability and acceptability in a national study.
The Palliative Care Problem Severity Score is a clinician-rated tool to assess problem severity in four palliative care domains (pain, other symptoms, psychological/spiritual, family/carer problems) using a 4-point categorical scale (absent, mild, moderate, severe). ⋯ The Palliative Care Problem Severity Score is an acceptable measure, with moderate reliability across three domains. Variability in inter-rater reliability across sites and participant feedback indicate that ongoing education is required to ensure that clinicians understand the purpose of the tool and each of its domains. Raters familiar with the patient they were assessing found it easier to assign problem severity, but this did not improve inter-rater reliability.