Surgical endoscopy
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Intraperitoneal and intravenous lidocaine for effective pain relief after laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
The preemptive intravenous and intraperitoneal application of local anesthetics is known to improve the postoperative outcome in abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effect of intravenous lidocaine injection to that of intraperitoneal lidocaine instillation in patients who were undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). ⋯ Intravenous lidocaine injection is as effective as intraperitoneal instillation for reducing pain and fentanyl consumption. The major benefit of intravenous injection is that this is an easily and universally applicable procedure compared to that of intraperitoneal instillation. Lidocaine intravenous administration is a better alternative for reducing the pain of patients who are undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Mesh fixation compared to nonfixation in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial in a rural center in India.
Several studies have shown that nonfixation of mesh in total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair is safe and has no disadvantage compared to mesh fixation in terms of recurrence rate, pain scores, and other morbidity parameters. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of nonfixation of mesh with fixation in laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair in a rural hospital in India. ⋯ There was no significant difference between fixation and nonfixation of mesh in TEP inguinal hernia repair with respect to postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, resumption of normal activities, seroma formation, and recurrence rate. Nonfixation of mesh is safe and recommended in TEP inguinal hernia repair when done by an experienced surgeon, even in a rural setting. The study highlights the potential for universal application of the procedure.