Journal of neurotrauma
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Jun 2005
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialEfficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study.
To compare the effect of standard trauma craniectomy (STC) versus limited craniectomy (LC) on the outcome of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with refractory intracranial hypertension, we conducted a study at five medical centers of 486 patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score = 8) and refractory intracranial hypertension. In all 486 cases, refractory intracranial hypertension, caused by unilateral massive frontotemporoparietal contusion, intracerebral/subdural hematoma, and brain edema, was confirmed on a CT scan. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, one of which underwent STC (n = 241) with a unilateral frontotemporoparietal bone flap (12 x 15 cm), and the second of which underwent LC (n = 245) with a routine temporoparietal bone flap (6 x 8 cm). ⋯ In addition to these findings, the incidence of delayed intracranial hematoma, incisional hernia, and CSF fistula was lower in the STC group than in the LC group (p < 0.05), although the incidence of acute encephalomyelocele, traumatic seizure, and intracranial infection was not significantly different in the two groups (p > 0.05). The results of the study indicate that STC significantly improves outcome in severe TBI with refractory intracranial hypertension resulting from unilateral frontotemporoparietal contusion with or without intracerebral or subdural hematoma. This suggests that STC, rather than LC, be recommended for such patients.