Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Liberal or restrictive fluid management during elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
This article reviews if a restrictive fluid management policy reduces the complication rate if compared to liberal fluid management policy during elective surgery. The PubMed database was explored by 2 independent researchers. We used the following search terms: "Blood transfusion (MESH); transfusion need; fluid therapy (MESH); permissive hypotension; fluid management; resuscitation; restrictive fluid management; liberal fluid management; elective surgery; damage control resuscitation; surgical procedures, operative (MESH); wounds (MESH); injuries (MESH); surgery; trauma patients." A secondary search in the Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library revealed no additional results. ⋯ The total complication rate (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.64), risk of infection (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79), and transfusion rate (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.99) were also lower. The postoperative rebleeding did not differ in both groups: RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.28-2.06). We conclude that compared with a liberal fluid policy, a restrictive fluid policy in elective surgery results in a 35% reduction in patients with a complication and should be advised as the preferred fluid management policy.
-
Observational Study
Evaluation of pH on removed tracheal tubes after general anesthesia: a prospective observational study.
Aspiration pneumonia is a complication of tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. We hypothesized that tracheal tubes removed after anesthesia that have an acidic pH may reflect latent regurgitation of gastric fluid. ⋯ Acidic pH was found on about 2.5% of removed tracheal tubes. These tubes were used in patients who were in the prone or head-down position during general anesthesia, although they did not exhibit significant aspiration symptom. Anesthesiologists should be aware of the inherent risk of gastric fluid regurgitation when their patients undergo general anesthesia in these positions.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Quality of recovery from anesthesia of patients undergoing balanced or total intravenous general anesthesia. Prospective randomized clinical trial.
The aim of the present study was to assess the quality of recovery from anesthesia of patients subjected to otorhinolaryngological (ORL) surgery under balanced or total intravenous general anesthesia by means of Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire. ⋯ The quality of recovery from anesthesia assessed based on the patients' perception did not differ between the ones subjected to either inhalation or intravenous general anesthesia for ORL surgery based on QoR-40 questionnaire assessment.
-
Review Comparative Study
Efficacy and safety of sugammadex compared to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Sugammadex has been introduced for reversal of rocuronium (or vecuronium)-induced neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Although its efficacy has been established, data are conflicting whether it is safer than neostigmine traditionally used for reversing NMB. ⋯ Results from this meta-analysis suggest that sugammadex is superior to neostigmine, as it reverses NMB faster and more reliably, with a lower risk of AEs.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Effect of endovenous lidocaine on analgesia and serum cytokines: double-blinded and randomized trial.
This trial aimed to compare postoperative analgesia, opioid consumption, duration of ileus and hospital stay, and cytokine levels in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomies who received intravenous lidocaine in comparison with a control group. ⋯ Intravenous lidocaine was not able to reduce postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and duration of ileus or length of hospital stay. However, its anti-inflammatory effect was noticeable.