Current opinion in anaesthesiology
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Oct 2003
Peripheral nerve blocks for anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia.
Perioperative analgesia is a major concern for the patient and for the anesthesiologist, whose task is to avoid pain and all related complications on immediate outcome and healing. Regional anesthesia, alone or combined with general anesthesia, is becoming a preferred technique in a variety of surgical procedures. There is increasing interest in peripheral nerve blocks, single or continuous, mainly for perioperative treatment of unilateral surgery. Specificity of analgesic area combined with decreased complications, including spinal or epidural hematoma, urinary retention, or hemodynamic alterations, are advantages of the peripheral nerve block over more central neural blocks. ⋯ Possibilities afforded by the use of peripheral nerve blocks mainly consist of prolonged analgesia, selective area of action, and fewer collateral effects when compared with general anesthesia or more central neural blockade. Introduction of new devices and new techniques are increasing, as evidenced by the large number of studies which have appeared in the literature during the past year.
-
The present overview will try to summarize the most important recent studies performed on spinal analgesia for labor pain treatment and spinal anesthesia for Cesarean section. ⋯ The new local anesthetics have established their position in obstetric regional anesthesia, but it remains difficult to demonstrate a superior outcome as compared with bupivacaine. The same is true for combined spinal-epidural and ambulation. Phenylephrine seems to have become the vasopressor of choice in the treatment of hypotension following spinal anesthesia. A more appropriate treatment of hypotension combined with a low-dose technique may enhance the safety of spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic patients or cases of severe cardiac disease.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Oct 2003
Complications and local anaesthetic toxicity in regional anaesthesia.
Local anaesthetic agents are administered every day in clinical practice. These agents are relatively safe when administered in proper dosages at appropiate anatomical sites. However, when excessive dosages are administered or the incorrect site of administration is used there is a potential for toxic reactions. Ropivacaine, a pure S-enantiomer, and levobupivacaine, a single isomer of bupivacaine, have been introduced as new long-acting local anaesthetic agents with a potentially reduced toxicity compared with bupivacaine. The present review deals with recent knowledge about systemically induced local anaesthetic toxicity and localized toxicity. ⋯ Current evidence suggests that ropivacaine is slightly less toxic than levobupivacaine; however, the difference in potency between the two agents is greater. The new local anaesthetic agents can be regarded as 'safer', but must not be regarded as safe.
-
There has been a growing interest in elucidating the immune consequences of opioid administration for the management of pain. Several studies in vitro and in vivo have demonstrated an immunomodulating effect of opioids. The neuro-endocrine interactions observed after opioid application contribute to this effect as well as direct alterations of immune effector cells. Opioid-induced immunomodulation is mediated by opioid receptors found on immunocytes and in the central nervous system. This review will elucidate the molecular mechanisms of central and peripheral immunomodulation by opioids with special emphasis on the clinical significance of these findings. ⋯ Although immunomodulating effects of opioids are well established, a final statement regarding the clinical relevance cannot be made, since the existing clinical and experimental data are preliminary and inconclusive. Therefore, further clinical studies are mandatory to elucidate the influence of opioid treatment on immune regulation in different clinical settings. Further investigations may help to provide sufficient analgesia by application of opioids, as well as assessing the advantages and disadvantages on immune function.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Oct 2003
Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia for surgery: still going strong?
The discussion on the value of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia for surgery is fuelled by current controversies regarding effects on postoperative morbidity and mortality, potential benefits for outcome and the fear of rare, but catastrophic neurological complications. This review of the most recent publications on the topic since April 2002 illustrates some of the aspects contributing to the ongoing discussion. ⋯ In an era of evidence-based medicine, further meta-analyses and well-planned large randomized trials have to address the controversial issues of epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and postoperative outcome. In the context of a more holistic 'rehabilitative' management of the perioperative period, this technique might well represent a key factor to improve outcome, reduce hospital stay and thereby healthcare costs. Recent innovations and developments in techniques and drugs as well as established guidelines should further minimize potential errors and harmful complications.