Current opinion in anaesthesiology
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Jun 2019
ReviewIs opioid-free general anesthesia for breast and gynecological surgery a viable option?
Opioid-free general anesthesia is a viable anesthetic technique for breast and gynecological surgery.
pearl -
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Jun 2019
ReviewEpidural test dose in obstetric patients: should we still use it?
As the application of a test dose after epidural catheter insertion in obstetrics has recurrently been associated with serious adverse events affecting both maternal and foetal outcomes, the question whether to test or not remains a controversial issue. ⋯ Physiological alterations during pregnancy and labour restrict the use and also the validity of traditional test agents. Epinephrine is not appropriate to detect a vascular insertion in labour and the application of a local anaesthetic test dose may lead to dose-dependent fatal consequences should the catheter be intrathecal, due to an increased sensitivity in parturients. Given the current practice of opioid-amended-low-concentration epidurals, the waiving of a test dose results at worst in a failed epidural, a stark contrast to the potentially severe to fatal complications of a 'traditional' test dose. Hence, an originally preventive measure providing potentially more harm than the consequences of the situation aimed to prevent, should not be recommended. A simple fractionated administration of the initial analgesic dose seems reasonable though.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Jun 2019
ReviewCentral neurological complications following obstetric neuraxial blockade.
Central neuraxial blockade is increasingly the anaesthetic management of choice for parturients, including in higher risk pregnancies. Although they are usually effective and safe, there are potentially devastating neurological complications that may present either overtly or insidiously. A thorough understanding of the variety of potential neurological complications is essential to adequately consent patients in addition to diagnosing and managing complications following neuraxial anaesthesia. This review aims to describe a number of potential neurological injuries that may occur and suggested management based on available evidence. ⋯ Difficulty remains in establishing absolute risk of complications and optimal management strategies given the low overall number of patients affected and heterogeneity of therapy. There may be a role for centralized registration of postneuraxial complications in obstetric patients to further develop our collective understanding of these conditions.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Jun 2019
ReviewPostpartum hemorrhage revisited: new challenges and solutions.
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States, and worldwide. Recognition of PPH is challenging, but once hemorrhage is recognized, management needs to focus on achieving adequate uterine tone and maintaining maternal hemodynamic stability. There have been several advances in the management of postpartum hemorrhage, many of which can be implemented at the labor and delivery unit level. ⋯ Although postpartum hemorrhage itself may not be preventable, early identification of blood loss, and mobilization of resources may prevent adverse outcomes. Multidisciplinary planning at the system level, ensuring that hemorrhage protocols exist, as well as for management of high-risk patients is important for improving patient outcomes.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Jun 2019
ReviewOutcomes after paediatric anaesthesia: which ones should have the priority?
To review the developments within paediatric anaesthesia and describe the various factors that have contributed to the improvements in anaesthesia-related outcomes in children. ⋯ Despite a steadily and significant improvement in paediatric anaesthesia-related outcomes over the years further and future improvements are still necessary in areas such as adverse-event reporting and long-term neurocognitive outcomes with much more focus on patient/family-centred outcomes. Clinical experts and stakeholders should meet and agree on a consensus to identify indicators that could act as outcome measures in future large-scale prospective observational studies and clinical trials. Such an approach will foster benchmarking and continuous quality assessment and improvement at individual, institutional, interinstitutional, regional, national and international levels and facilitate larger scale clinical research. Furthermore, it will attain a high public health importance and will facilitate comparisons between healthcare provision models leading to optimization of perioperative care delivery.