Journal of anesthesia
-
Journal of anesthesia · Dec 2018
Comment LetterReply to the letter regarding NADPH oxidase inhibitor.
Abstract
-
Journal of anesthesia · Dec 2018
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyThe effect of anesthetic technique on µ-opioid receptor expression and immune cell infiltration in breast cancer.
Clinical histological studies demonstrate that the distribution of natural killer (NK) cells, other immune cells and μ-opioid receptors (MOR) within cancer tissue can predict cancer prognosis. No clinical study has evaluated whether anesthetic technique influences immune cell and MOR expression within human breast cancer. ⋯ General anesthesia with opioid analgesia increased resected tumor MOR expression compared with propofol-paravertebral anesthetic technique, but the anesthetic technique did not significantly influence the expression of immune cell markers.
-
Journal of anesthesia · Dec 2018
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyUltrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block in pediatrics: trans-muscular versus intra-muscular approach.
Quadratus lumborum (QL) block has four approaches. However, there is difference between the four approaches regarding efficacy, safety and adverse effects. The primary objective of this study is to compare the analgesic effect between trans-muscular and intra-muscular approaches of the QL block in pediatric patients for elective lower abdominal surgery. ⋯ TQL is better than IQL in the analgesic efficacy following the pediatric lower laparotomy.
-
Journal of anesthesia · Dec 2018
Clinical TrialEffectiveness of preanesthetic administration of gabapentin on sedative action during intravenous sedation with propofol.
There are no sufficient evidences for the sedative effect of gabapentin during anesthesia, especially intravenous sedation (IVS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sedative effect of gabapentin as preanesthetic medication during the IVS with propofol. ⋯ The oral administration of 400 mg dose of gabapentin reduced the propofol CTs for achieving an adequate sedation level on IVS.
-
Journal of anesthesia · Dec 2018
Bite injuries caused by transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials' monitoring: incidence, associated factors, and clinical course.
The incidence of bite injuries associated with transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials monitoring reportedly ranges from 0.13 to 0.19%. However, in clinical practice, bite injuries appear to occur more frequently than previously reported. Our aim was to identify the incidence of and perioperative risk factors associated with bite injuries caused by transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring. ⋯ The incidence of bite injuries assessed by oral surgeons was 6.5% in patients with transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring, and the patients with severe movement during the monitoring tended to incur bite injuries. In rare cases, transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potential monitoring may cause difficulty in oral intake and dysgeusia.