Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Oct 2012
ReviewPreclinical research into the effects of anesthetics on the developing brain: promises and pitfalls.
Every year millions of children are treated with anesthetics and sedatives to alleviate pain and distress during invasive procedures. Accumulating evidence suggests the possibility for deleterious effects on the developing brain. ⋯ Accordingly, this review summarizes the current state of animal research in this field, introduces some of the findings presented at the PANDA symposium, and addresses some of the difficulties in translating these findings to pediatric anesthesia practice, as discussed during the symposium. The symposium participants' consensus was that significant preclinical and clinical research efforts are still needed to investigate this important concern for child health.
-
Despite the fact that it has been used since the 1960s in diseases associated with brain edema and has been investigated in >150 publications on head injury, very little has been published on the outcome of osmotherapy. We can only speculate whether osmotherapy improves outcome, has no effect on outcome, or leads to worse outcome. Here we describe the action and potentially beneficial and adverse effects of the 2 most commonly used osmotic solutions, mannitol and hypertonic saline, and present some critical aspects of their use. ⋯ These drawbacks, and the fact that the most recent Cochrane meta-analyses of osmotherapy in brain edema and stroke could not find any beneficial effects on outcome, make routine use of osmotherapy in brain edema doubtful. Nevertheless, the use of osmotherapy as a temporary measure may be justified to acutely prevent brain stem compression until other measures, such as evacuation of space-occupying lesions or decompressive craniotomy, can be performed. This article is the Con part in a Pro-Con debate in the present journal on the general routine use of osmotherapy in brain edema.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Oct 2012
Review Meta AnalysisPediatric anesthesia and neurodevelopmental impairments: a Bayesian meta-analysis.
Experimental evidence of anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity has caused serious concern about the long-term effect of commonly used volatile anesthetic agents on young children. Several observational studies based on existing data have been conducted to address this concern with inconsistent results. We conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize the epidemiologic evidence on the association of anesthesia/surgery with neurodevelopmental outcomes in children. ⋯ The most likely adjusted OR from a future study was estimated to be 1.5 (95% CrI, 0.5-4.0). We conclude that existent epidemiologic evidence suggests a modestly elevated risk of adverse behavioral or developmental outcomes in children who were exposed to anesthesia/surgery during early childhood. The evidence, however, is considerably uncertain.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Oct 2012
ReviewPRO: osmotherapy for the treatment of acute intracranial hypertension.
Persisting severe brain edema causes intracranial hypertension and is associated with poor patient outcome. The treatment of acute intracranial hypertension is complex and multimodal. The most important options for medical treatment include controlled ventilation and osmotherapy, maintenance of brain and body homeostasis, and sedation. ⋯ However, hypertonic saline seems advantageous over mannitol in many situations. In multitrauma patients, hypertonic saline contributes to hemodynamic stabilization and to the prevention of secondary insults. In addition, hypertonic saline has neurohumoral and immunologic effects, which may be beneficial in cerebral resuscitation.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 2012
ReviewPerioperative steroids for peritumoral intracranial edema: a review of mechanisms, efficacy, and side effects.
There has been a renewed interest in the recent literature regarding the proposed benefits of systemic steroids in the perioperative period. Among these benefits are the relief of postoperative pain, the decrease in postoperative nausea, and a higher overall multiparameter quality of recovery. ⋯ The use of perioperative steroids for brain tumor treatment and resection has been a component of therapy for approximately 50 years, owing primarily to their well-described, although poorly understood, effect in minimizing vasogenic peritumoral edema, and therefore intracranial pressure. This review seeks to highlight the history, mechanisms, therapeutic efficacy, and side effects of steroid use for brain tumors in the perioperative period.