Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial7.5% hypertonic saline versus 20% mannitol during elective neurosurgical supratentorial procedures.
This prospective randomized clinical study was designed to compare the effects of equal volumes of 7.5% hypertonic saline solution (HS) or 20% mannitol (M) on brain bulk and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) during elective neurosurgical procedures (aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, or tumor). After informed consent, 50 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical Status I (ASA I) patients were randomly assigned to M (n = 25) or HS (n = 25) groups. Anesthesia protocol was identical for both, and variables monitored included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), central venous pressure (CVP), CSF pressure (CSFP), arterial blood gases (PaCO2 30-35 mm Hg), serum sodium, potassium, and osmolality, and diuresis. ⋯ During the study, brain bulk was always considered satisfactory. CSFP was not different between M and HS groups and significantly decreased overtime (p = 0.0056) with no difference between treatments. The results of the present study demonstrate that hypertonic saline is as effective as mannitol in reducing the brain bulk and the CSFP during elective neurosurgical procedures under general anesthesia.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialConvection versus conduction cooling for induction of mild hypothermia during neurovascular procedures in adults.
Hypothermia for cerebral protection is usually achieved by administration of intravenous fluids at room temperature, cooling ambient air, ice packs, and a temperature-adjustable circulating water mattress. We compared cooling by conduction by using a water mattress to cool by convection by using a forced-air cooling device. Twenty patients were prospectively randomized to two groups: 10 patients cooled by convection (CC) and 10 patients cooled by traditional methods (TC). ⋯ CC, 142 +/- 21 min). One patient had some arrhythmias on cooling in the convective group, but her preoperative condition may have been responsible. In conclusion, cooling by convection appears to be a safe alternative to conduction cooling.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe use of ketamine or etomidate to supplement sufentanil/N2O anesthesia does not disrupt monitoring of myogenic transcranial motor evoked responses.
Intraoperative monitoring of myogenic transcranial motor evoked responses (tc-MERs) requires an anesthetic technique that minimally depresses response amplitudes. Acceptable results have been obtained during opioid/N2O anesthesia, provided that the concentration of N2O does not exceed 50%. However, this technique may necessitate supplementation with additional agents to achieve adequate depth of anesthesia. ⋯ Administration of ketamine did not significantly change tc-MER amplitudes, whereas etomidate resulted in a transient amplitude depression to 72% of control (p < 0.05) at 2 min after injection. Latency remained unchanged with both drugs. In conclusion, the data suggest that both ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) and etomidate (0.1 mg/kg) can be used to supplement sufentanil/N2O anesthetic without disrupting tc-MER monitoring.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPatient-controlled sedation using propofol during interventional neuroradiologic procedures.
Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) using propofol has been reported to provide safe and effective sedation during a variety of procedures performed under regional or local anesthesia. In a prospective, randomized fashion, this study evaluated propofol PCS compared to anesthesiologist-administered midazolam-fentanyl sedation during interventional neuroradiologic (INR) procedures. Nineteen patients undergoing 24 INR procedures received propofol PCS (PCS dose, 0.5 mg/kg; lockout interval, 3 min) or anesthesiologist-administered midazolam-fentanyl sedation. ⋯ These included ventilatory depression (two patients in each group) and excessive sedation (two patients in each group). Three patients in the propofol group became excessively restless, resulting in brief interruptions during the respective procedures. Propofol PCS offers a safe sedation technique during INR procedures with a sedation and anxiolysis profile that was not distinguishable from anesthesiologist-administered midazolam-fentanyl sedation.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Oct 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffects of perioperative indomethacin on intracranial pressure, cerebral blood flow, and cerebral metabolism in patients subjected to craniotomy for cerebral tumors.
This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of perioperative indomethacin on intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and cerebral metabolism. Twenty patients subjected to craniotomy for supratentorial cerebral tumors were anesthetized with thiopental, fentanyl, nitrous oxide, and isoflurane. A PaCO2 level averaging 4.8 kPa (median) was achieved. ⋯ In one patient, mannitol treatment was necessary to prevent dural tightness. In the placebo group, mannitol supplemented with hypocapnia was applied in five patients. These findings suggest that perioperative treatment with indomethacin is an excellent treatment of intracranial hypertension during normocapnic isoflurane anesthesia for craniotomy.