Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Intranasal fentanyl is an equivalent analgesic to oral morphine in paediatric burns patients for dressing changes: a randomised double blind crossover study.
The ideal analgesic agent for burns wound dressings in paediatric patients would be one that is easy to administer, well tolerated, and produces rapid onset of analgesia with a short duration of action and minimal side-effects to allow rapid resumption of activities and oral intake. We compared our current treatment of oral morphine to intranasal fentanyl in an attempt to find an agent closer to the ideal. ⋯ Intranasal fentanyl was shown to be equivalent to oral morphine in the provision of analgesia for burn wound dressing changes in this cohort of paediatric patients. It was concluded that intranasal fentanyl is a suitable analgesic agent for use in paediatric burns dressing changes either by itself or in combination with oral morphine as a top up titratable agent.
-
In recent years, the need for a national burn center based on ABA guidelines has emerged in Israel. The formation of such a center is now underway in the Chaim Sheba Medical Center. As a first step in the standardization of burn care in Israel, we have conducted a nation-wide survey among burn care personnel (physicians, nurses and other burn team members), regarding different aspects of the treatment of burn patients. ⋯ Seventy-seven percent of interviewed personnel participated in the survey. Consensus was found regarding most local (topical) wound care, (SSD for clean non-facial burns, Sulfamylon (mafenide-acetate) for contaminated non-facial burns, Threolone (chloramphenicol 3% and prednisolone 0.5%) or Bacitracin for facial burns, Paraffin gauzes with or without Sulfamylon for donor and graft sites). Dressing changes regimes were also agreed upon generally. However, there was no consensus regarding the ideal time for the removal of donor site dressings and this issue will need to be resolved. Other important findings are that both Edinborough University Solution of Lime (EUSOL), which has been deemed unsuitable for burn treatment due to toxic effects, and hydrotherapy, which has been proposed as a source of infection and contamination, are still widely used. We anticipate that these issues will be settled in our unified national burn care protocols (which are currently under development and revision).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Biobrane versus duoderm for the treatment of intermediate thickness burns in children: a prospective, randomized trial.
In this study, we directly compared the efficacy of Biobrane and Duoderm for the treatment of small intermediate thickness burns in children in a prospective, randomized fashion to determine their relative impact on wound healing, pain scores, and cost. Patients under 18 years of age with intermediate thickness burns on a surface area less than 10% were enrolled and treated with one of the two dressing systems. Data collected included mechanism of injury, time to complete healing, pain scores, and institutional cost of materials until healing was complete. ⋯ The cost of each treatment was statistically more expensive in the Biobrane group. The results of this study demonstrate that Duoderm and Biobrane provide equally effective treatment of partial thickness burns among in the pediatric population. However, Duoderm is statistically less expensive than Biobrane and can be considered a first-line treatment option for intermediate thickness burn wounds in children.
-
Cement is increasingly used in the construction industry, but the occurrence of cement burns is rarely reported. This retrospective study concerns patients treated for cement burns in our unit between 1997 and 2002. ⋯ This study indicates once again the need to improve preventive measures; which are very often inadequate because of lack of awareness of risks.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Lubricant and razor debridement in partial thickness burn.
By aiming to relieve pain from removing blisters in partial thickness burn, we tested whether the application of a sterile lubricant (KY-Jelly) on blisters and the use of a sterile razor to remove their roof can reduce algesia in humans, compared to a conventional method. A prospective randomized controlled designed study was performed on 20 patients. A visual pain scale was used by patients to evaluate pain experienced.