Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
The efficacy of resistance training in addition to usual care for adults with acute burn injury: A randomised controlled trial.
Resistance training immediately after a burn injury has not been investigated previously. This randomised, controlled trial assessed the impact of resistance training on quality of life plus a number of physical, functional and safety outcomes in adults with a burn injury. Patients were randomly assigned to receive, in addition to standard physiotherapy, four weeks of high intensity resistance training (RTG) or sham resistance training (CG) three days per week, commenced within 72h of the burn injury. ⋯ Total quality of life scores, lower limb disability, muscle strength and volume were not seen to be different between groups (p>0.05). Resistance training in addition to usual rehabilitation therapy showed evidence of improving functional outcomes, particularly in upper limb burn injuries. Additionally, resistance training commenced acutely after a burn injury was not seen to be harmful to patients.
-
Multicenter Study
Mortality prognostication scores do not predict long-term, health-related quality of life after burn: A burn model system national database study.
Despite improved mortality rates after burn injury, many patients face significant long-term physical and psychosocial disabilities. We aimed to determine whether commonly used mortality prognostication scores predict long-term, health-related quality of life after burn injury. By doing so, we might add evidence to support goals of care discussions and facilitate shared decision-making efforts in the hours and days after a life-changing injury. ⋯ Higher revised Baux and Ryan Scores negatively correlated with long-term physical health, but not mental health, after burn injury. Regardless, the models poorly explained the variance in SF-12 scores one year after injury. More accurate models are needed to predict long-term, health-related quality of life and support shared decision-making during acute burn care.
-
The first half of the year 2020 has been shaped by quarantines and lock-downs all over the world. The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a pandemic, that slowed down not only social interactions and economy, but also medical and health care. Governments and hospitals were forced to create ad hoc emergency plans maintaining the balance between an adequate participation in collective response of shutting-down to avoid a further spreading of the virus, while preserving the ongoing acute care and simultaneously being able to react to an imminent overextension with a collapse of capacities. ⋯ Particular attention has to be paid to attentive screening of patients and triaging of surgeries during the re-boot. The re-boot needs to be slow and steady to reduce the risk of an infectiological relapse. Once this pandemic is defeated, a careful re-evaluation of the different internationally applied strategies should be performed to be prepared for the future.
-
Observational Study
Factors associated with adherence to follow-up care after burn injuries.
In South Africa, burns result in excessive morbidity which can be mitigated via follow-up treatments. This study evaluated factors associated with care retention for after burn injuries. ⋯ High follow up attrition suggests the need for enhanced engagement in the high-risk burn population studied, and the identified factors could be leveraged in such programming.