Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Apr 1982
Comparative StudyAdvantages of glycopyrrolate over atropine during reversal of pancuronium block.
Atropine 0.015 mg kg-1 and glycopyrrolate 0.0075 mg kg-1 were compared as antimuscarinic agents during reversal of pancuronium block with neostigmine 0.03 mg kg-1 in 30 patients anaesthetized with thiopental - N2O- fentanyl and undergoing minor surgery. The decrease of heart rate was more pronounced in patients who received atropine-neostigmine. ⋯ Recovery from anaesthesia, as assessed by the awakening after the discontinuation of N2O administration, was more rapid in patients given glycopyrrolate. In conclusion, glycopyrrolate seems to have advantages over atropine when used during reversal of pancuronium block with neostigmine.
-
A series of 100 patients undergoing caesarean section was studied using ketamine 1.2 mg/kg as induction agent. Fifteen minutes prior to induction, atropine 0.25-0.5 mg and diazepam 1 mg was given intravenously as premedication. Anaesthesia was maintained with N2O:O2, FIO2 0.4. ⋯ There were no hallucinations in the recovery area. The mental condition of the mothers after the operation was acceptable. It is suggested that ketamine can be used not only on special indications but also as a routine method for induction of anaesthesia for caesarean section.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Feb 1982
Cardiocirculatory effects of prolonged administration of isoflurane in normocarbic human volunteers.
Effects of the prolonged administration of isoflurane on haemodynamics were studied in 17 healthy volunteers under normocarbic conditions. The anaesthetic was administered for 90 min at a constant alveolar concentration. Cardiac index was unchanged in the presence of decrease stroke volume index and increased heart rate. ⋯ Left ventricular work decreased. The left ventricular ejection time index increased marginally but significantly. Isoflurane caused no change in the pump performance of the heart but depressed the muscle performance.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Feb 1982
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialInfluence of epidural morphine on postoperative pain, endocrine-metabolic, and renal responses to surgery. A controlled study.
In order to assess the analgesic properties of epidural low-dose morphine and its possible influence on the adrenocortical, hyperglycemic, renal, electrolyte and leukocyte responses to surgery and nitrogen excretion, a double-blind randomized study was undertaken in 14 otherwise healthy patients admitted for hysterectomy under halothane, N2O/o2 anesthesia. Before induction of anesthesia, an epidural catheter was introduced into the lumbar epidural space. After induction of anesthesia, either morphine 4 mg in 10 ml saline or 10 ml saline was injected into the epidural space, according to the allocation. ⋯ Plasma concentration of cortisol and glucose, plasma-and urine electrolytes, 24-h creatinine and free-water clearances, diuresis, fluid balance, leukocyte count and nitrogen excretion differed insignificantly between groups. In conclusion, epidural low-dose morphine is a superior alternative to conventional postoperative pain treatment because of greater and longer lasting pain relief, without apparent side-effects. The measured endocrine-metabolic and renal response did not differ between groups, indicating that low-dose epidural morphine does not inhibit afferent neurogenic stimuli from the site of surgical trauma.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Feb 1982
Droperidol (Dehydrobenzperidol): postoperative anti-emetic effect when given intravenously to gynaecological patients.
In a double-blind investigation, comprising 300 gynaecological patients, the prophylactic use of droperidol i.v. at the start of the anaesthesia produced significant reduction in the frequency of nausea and vomiting postoperatively in the first 24 h from 34.4% to 10.3% (P=0.0001). There was no significant difference between the effect of droperidol 2.5 mg and 5 mg (P=0.45). Increased postoperative sedation was the only side-effect of any importance observed; however, this did not result in any increased period of observation in the recovery room, and the majority of patients considered it advantageous. Droperidol is recommended as a prophylactic anti-emetic for selected groups of patients, given as 2.5 mg i.v. at the start of the anaesthesia.