Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 1985
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA controlled study on the effect of epidural analgesia with local anaesthetics and morphine on morbidity after abdominal surgery.
A hundred patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were randomized to either general anaesthesia (low-dose fentanyl) and systemic morphine for postoperative pain or combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia with etidocaine 1.5% intraoperatively (T4-S5) and bupivacaine 0.5% 5 ml/4 h for 24 h and morphine 4 mg/12 h for 72 h. Postoperative pain was better controlled by the epidural regimen (P less than 0.0001). We found no significant reduction in postoperative mortality (6% to 2%), pneumonia (28% to 20%), cardiac dysrhythmia (10% to 5%) and wound complications (14% to 11%) by the epidural analgesic regimen. ⋯ Postoperative weight loss and decrease in serum-albumin and serum-transferrin, as well as the reduction in haemoglobin and the need for postoperative transfusions, were similar in the two groups. Convalescence, as assessed by postoperative fatigue, restoration of bowel function (flatus, bowel movement and food intake) and the time until the patients were self-aided at their preoperative level, was not reduced by epidural analgesia. Since 50% of the patients in each group suffered from one or more of the above-mentioned postoperative complications, this epidural regimen was not effective in reducing postoperative morbidity after major abdominal surgery despite the achievement of adequate pain relief.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Aug 1985
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffect of aspiration of cerebro-spinal fluid on spinal anaesthesia with isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine.
The effect of changing the volume of cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) before spinal anaesthesia with 3 ml of isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine was investigated in 60 elderly (58-77 years) orthopaedic or urological patients. The patients were randomly allocated to three groups. They received the spinal anaesthetic either with or without the aspiration of 3 ml of CSF. ⋯ The anaesthesia was satisfactory in most cases. One death occurred because of a massive pulmonary embolism. The clinical significance of aspirating CSF before attempting spinal anaesthesia with 3 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine was found to be small.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · May 1985
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffect of a small dose of droperidol on nausea, vomiting and recovery after outpatient enflurane anaesthesia.
Young, healthy outpatients (100) undergoing restorative dentistry and/or oral surgery under enfluranenitrous oxide-oxygen anaesthesia were given 0.014 mg/kg of droperidol or a saline placebo i.v. in a double-blind random fashion 5 min after induction of anaesthesia to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Overall, less patients given droperidol were nauseated (18%) or vomited (7%) in comparison with patients given saline (27% and 11%, respectively). During the first postoperative hour, 4% of patients given droperidol were nauseated and 2% vomited, whereas 16% of patients given saline were nauseated and 6% vomited. ⋯ After 60 min, only one patient given droperidol and four patients who received saline and vomited took side steps or were unable to walk. Psychomotor performance was significantly (P less than 0.05) better in a perceptual speed test both 30 and 60 min after anaesthesia in patients receiving saline as compared to those given droperidol. It is concluded that although droperidol is a less effective antiemetic after outpatient than after inpatient enflurane anaesthesia, small doses of droperidol may be used for outpatients prone to vomiting to prevent delayed discharge from the clinic due to prolonged vomiting.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · May 1985
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialRespiratory performance after upper abdominal surgery. A comparison of pain relief with intercostal blocks and centrally acting analgesics.
The respiratory capacity was studied during the first 2 days postoperatively in 94 patients, aged 19 to 75 years and undergoing surgery through an upper abdominal incision. Postoperative pain relief was randomly administered, either by intercostal block (i.c.b.) and centrally acting analgesics on demand, or by centrally acting analgesics alone. Respiratory studies comprising forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) and analysis of arterial blood gases were made. ⋯ Thus postoperative i.c.b. following cholecystectomy performed through a subcostal incision resulted in higher FVC, FEV1 and PEF values than without i.c.b. at least during the time of effective nerve block. I.c.b. after subcostal incision also improved arterial oxygen tension. The patients undergoing cholecystectomy and receiving a second i.c.b. 8 h after the first one had better respiratory function than the patients without any block during the first 2 days postoperatively.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Apr 1985
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIsoflurane v fentanyl for outpatient laparoscopy.
Isoflurane and fentanyl have been compared as anaesthetic agents for outpatient laparoscopy. In 50 female patients anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone and maintained with nitrous oxide 66% in oxygen combined with either isoflurane 1-2% or fentanyl 0.3 mg according to a randomized list. Suxamethonium was used to facilitate intubation and for further muscle relaxation. ⋯ Reaction times in the isoflurane patients returned to control by 3 h, whereas the fentanyl patients were 10% slower than control at 4 h (P less than 0.05 at 2 h, 3 h, 4 h). Nausea and vomiting were more frequent in the fentanyl group, and four of the fentanyl patients required naloxone. Both anaesthetic techniques provided satisfactory operating conditions, but isoflurane appeared to provide a better recovery with less side effects than fentanyl.