Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Jun 1994
ReviewPredictive accuracy of alfentanil infusion in coronary artery surgery: a prebypass study in middle-aged and elderly patients.
Twenty-three informed and consenting patients scheduled for CABG were anesthetized using computer-controlled infusions of alfentanil, midazolam, and pancuronium. Thirteen middle-aged patients received a preprogrammed infusion scheme of alfentanil, simulated using the population pharmacokinetic set of Maitre et al (Group M), and 10 elderly patients received a preprogrammed infusion scheme simulated using the model of Helmers et al (Group H). The target alfentanil concentrations in groups M and H for tracheal intubation were: 300-500 ng/mL and for sternotomy: 500-700 ng/mL. ⋯ The sets of Maitre et al and Helmers et al were found not to be accurate (MDAPE > 40%) in both groups M and H. The set of Scott et al with the lowest clearance (2.4 mL/kg/min) shows the best accuracy (MDAPE: 19.5%) and precision (P10: -40%, P90: 16%). In conclusion, the set of Scott et al should preferably be selected to predict prebypass alfentanil infusion accurately in either middle aged or elderly patients who have normal myocardial function (LVEF > 50%) and are scheduled for CABG.
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Jun 1994
Comparative StudyBlood pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass: which technique is accurate?
To evaluate the accuracy with which a patient's aortic blood pressure can be estimated upon separating from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), simultaneously recorded radial artery pressure, oscillometric brachial artery pressure, pressure in the CPB circuit, and the surgeon's estimate of blood pressure by aortic palpation were compared to directly measured aortic root pressure. After obtaining institutional approval and written informed consent, 20 patients requiring CPB for cardiac operations were studied. General anesthesia was induced and maintained with fentanyl, vecuronium, and enflurane. ⋯ The oscillometric technique and CPB line were poor estimates of aortic root pressure. Of the techniques used to estimate aortic blood pressure, including radial arterial, oscillometric, aortic line of the CPB circuit, and digital palpation, the radial arterial was the best, and the aortic line from the CPB machine and palpation by the surgeon were the worst. When a clinician is unsure of the blood pressure during separation from CPB, direct measurement of central aortic blood pressure is advised.
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Jun 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPropofol-fentanyl anesthesia: a comparison with isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia in coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgery.
The hemodynamic effects of propofol-fentanyl and isoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia during the prebypass period were compared in 42 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 22 patients undergoing valve replacement (VR) for stenotic lesions. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, 25 micrograms/kg, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg, and was maintained with a propofol infusion commenced at 4 mg/kg/h (range 1 to 10 mg/kg/h) or with isoflurane commenced at 1% (range 0 to 2%). Additional fentanyl, 7.5 micrograms/kg, was given before sternotomy. ⋯ Propofol produced similar hemodynamic changes in the CABG and VR groups. Both anesthetic techniques caused myocardial depression and effectively controlled the autonomic responses to sternotomy in both groups. The study suggests that propofol-fentanyl anesthesia is an acceptable technique for CABG surgery and for VR in patients with stenotic valvular heart disease.
-
J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. · Jun 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEsmolol and intraoperative myocardial ischemia: a double-blind study.
Forty patients scheduled to undergo elective myocardial revascularization were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate any influence of esmolol on the incidence of myocardial ischemia. Calibrated recordings of ECG leads II and V5 were continuously monitored with the QMED Monitor One TC (Qmed Inc, Clark, NJ) from the time of arrival in the operating room holding area through the induction of anesthesia, using a high-dose opioid technique, and until the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass. One group received a bolus of esmolol, 1.0 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 100 micrograms/kg/min. ⋯ Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and the number of patients developing myocardial ischemia during the course of the study also did not differ significantly between the groups. There were significant decreases in heart rate and mean arterial pressure compared with the awake baseline values in both groups during multiple study points. It is concluded that esmolol was ineffective at treating preexisting or new-onset myocardial ischemia at this dosage in this clinical setting.