American heart journal
-
American heart journal · Oct 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialEfegatran sulfate as an adjunct to streptokinase versus heparin as an adjunct to tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute myocardial infarction. ESCALAT Investigators.
Previous clinical studies have shown that direct antithrombins can accelerate clot lysis after treatment with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (MI). Efegatran is a new direct antithrombin, which in experimental animals has been shown to enhance thrombolysis, reduce rate of reocclusion, and limit infarct size. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of efegatran plus streptokinase versus heparin plus accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) in coronary reperfusion in acute MI. ⋯ The combination of efegatran plus streptokinase is not superior to the current therapy of heparin and accelerated TPA in achieving early patency. In addition, there is no indication that this experimental treatment can achieve better clinical outcome.
-
American heart journal · Oct 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffects of long-term adrenergic beta-blockade on left ventricular diastolic filling in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function are known to be affected in the wake of a myocardial infarction (MI). beta-Adrenergic blocking agents have demonstrated improvement of LV systolic and diastolic function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and theoretically would have same beneficial effects in MI. beta-Adrenergic blocking agents are widely used in MI; however only few reports on changes of LV systolic and diastolic function during long-term treatment after acute MI are available. ⋯ Long-term treatment with the beta-blocking agent metoprolol seems to improve LV diastolic filling after acute MI. Less restrictive LV filling was noted during beta-blockade indicated by a significant prolongation of the mitral E deceleration time, which was predominantly noted in patients with restrictive LV filling. This observation might have prognostic implications because this LV filling pattern is known to be associated with poor outcome. The changes of LV diastolic filling occurred during the first 3 months, whereas systolic recovery was seen at up to 12 months of treatment.