Paediatric anaesthesia
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Aug 2014
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyComparison of propofol and dexmedetomedine techniques in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.
Propofol (PRO) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) are commonly used to produce anesthesia and sedation for routine MRI procedures. Children with complex conditions often require much lengthy MRI for multi-body-part scans with frequent scanner coil changes and patient body reposition. This study compared PRO and DEX techniques on outcomes for the particular MRI setting with longer than 1 h duration. ⋯ For children undergoing lengthy multicomponent MRI, the propofol technique yielded overall better outcomes than the dexmedetomedine technique in terms of timeliness, PACU emergence characteristics, and parental satisfaction.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Aug 2014
Randomized Controlled TrialDoes the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children?
Both Miller and Macintosh blades are widely used for laryngoscopy in small children, though the Miller blade is more commonly recommended in pediatric anesthetic literature. The aim of this study was to compare laryngoscopic views and ease and success of intubation with Macintosh and Miller blades in small children under general anesthesia. ⋯ In children aged 1-24 months, the Miller and the Macintosh blades provide similar laryngoscopic views and intubating conditions. When a restricted view is obtained, a change of blade may provide a better view. Placing the tip of the Miller blade in the vallecula provides satisfactory intubating conditions in this age group.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Aug 2014
Randomized Controlled TrialNeonatal intubation with direct laryngoscopy vs videolaryngoscopy: an extremely premature baboon model.
To compare the ability to successfully intubate extremely preterm baboons using conventional direct laryngoscopy (DL) vs videolaryngoscopy. ⋯ Conventional DL and videolaryngoscopy are suitable modes for intubating extremely preterm baboons. Although experienced intubators prefer DL, intubation success rate and time to intubate with both devices were comparable. In inexperienced intubators, participants preferred and intubated faster with DL.