Paediatric anaesthesia
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialOndansetron reduces nausea and vomiting after paediatric adenotonsillectomy.
The efficacy, safety and resource implications of a single intravenous dose of ondansetron (0.1 mg.kg-1, maximum 4 mg) were assessed in a multinational, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 427 children aged 1-12 years, undergoing tonsillectomy with/without adenoidectomy. Emesis (retching and/or vomiting) and nausea were analysed separately. Significantly more ondansetron-treated children had no episodes of emesis (127/212 (60%) vs 100/215 (47%); P = 0.004) and experienced no postoperative nausea (135/211 (64%) vs 108/213 (51%); P = 0.004) in the first 24 h. ⋯ Significantly fewer ondansetron-treated children were rescued or withdrawn from the study (5% vs 10%; P = 0.042). Fewer ondansetron-treated patients required nursing intervention (34% vs 45%; P = 0.007) and the average intervention time was significantly shorter (4.6 vs 8.1 minutes; P = 0.001). Resources used to manage PONV were significantly reduced by ondansetron (43% vs 57%; P = 0.014).
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPropofol infusion vs thiopentone/isoflurane anaesthesia for prominent ear correction in children.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) frequently follows prominent ear correction under general anaesthesia in children. In a prospective, single-blind study, we compared the incidence of PONV after propofol infusion anaesthesia with that following thiopentone induction and isoflurane maintenance in 30 children aged from four to 14 years randomly allocated to one of two groups. All the children were mechanically ventilated. ⋯ One child receiving propofol (group P) complained of nausea, compared with eight receiving thiopentone/ isoflurane, (group T) (P = 0.005), while three children in group P and ten in group T vomited before hospital discharge, (P = 0.01). Eight children in group P were considered to be fit for discharge on the day of surgery as against four in group T, (not significant). Only four out of twelve children receiving opioid analgesia vomited.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAcetaminophen or ketorolac for post myringotomy pain in children? A prospective, double-blinded comparison.
Myringotomy with tube placement (BMT) is the most frequent surgical procedure performed in children. The purpose of this prospective, double-blinded study was to determine if 15 mg.kg-1 of acetaminophen (paracetamol) provides analgesia similar to that provided by ketorolac, 1 mg.kg-1, at a lower cost. One-hundred-and-thirty-two children, ages six months to nine years, scheduled for elective BMT were randomized to receive oral acetaminophen or ketorolac 30 min preoperatively. ⋯ Groups were comparable in demographics, side effects and time to discharge. Median pain scores were lower in the ketorolac group at five and ten min but no differences were seen at discharge nor in postdischarge analgesic requirements. Is ten min of better analgesia worth the cost of ketorolac? We conclude that the slight analgesic benefit from ketorolac does not justify its cost in this setting.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia vs propofol infusion in children having repeat minor haematological procedures.
We have performed a randomized, cross over study in 22 children suffering from acute leukaemia, who underwent repeated anaesthesia for bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture. For their first anaesthetic, the children (aged 3-10 years old) received, either a thiopentone/isoflurane anaesthetic or intravenous propofol, both supplemented with nitrous oxide. On a second occasion they received the alternative technique. ⋯ Twenty-seven per cent had no preference. There was no significant difference in length of anaesthetic time (P = 0.07) or the time taken for recovery (P = 0.17) between the two groups. There was a large individual variation in propofol requirements and movement was common during stimulation of patients in this group, though this did not adversely affect the surgical procedure.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialOral midazolam compared with diazepam-droperidol and trimeprazine as premedicants in children.
Ninety children were assigned randomly to one of three groups for premedication with oral midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1, diazepam 0.25 mg.kg-1 with droperidol 0.25 mg.kg-1, or trimeprazine 2 mg.kg-1. On arrival at the anaesthetic room, anxiolysis was satisfactory in 26 out of 29 (90%) children who received midazolam compared with 23 out of 29 (79%) who received diazepam-droperidol and 18 out of 29 (62%) who received trimeprazine (P < 0.05); at induction of anaesthesia these proportions were 24 out of 29 (83%), 16 out of 29 (55%) and 11 out of 29 (40%) respectively (P < 0.001). ⋯ There were no significant differences in times to early recovery between the groups (25.4, 24.4 and 28.5 min). Analysis of behavioural questionnaires completed two weeks after hospitalization showed a trend towards fewer postoperative behavioural disturbances in children who received midazolam or diazepam-droperidol compared with trimeprazine (47 and 44% vs 75%); when the results for the benzodiazepine-containing premedicants were combined, the difference between these groups and trimeprazine was statistically significant (P < 0.05).