Paediatric anaesthesia
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAxillary block in children: single or multiple injection?
The goal of this double-blind prospective study was to compare the effect of a single injection versus multiple fractionated doses on the onset time and quality of motor and sensory block, obtained in 70 children anaesthetized with axillary block alone. The brachial plexus was identified with a peripheral nerve stimulator, and blocked with 0.5 ml.kg-1 of 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline. In Group S (single injection), the total volume was injected after location of one nerve. ⋯ No adverse effect was observed and analgesia was prolonged for more than 4 h. We can conclude that, unlike adults, fractionated doses in chilren bring no benefit to the quality of sensory and motor block. Selective block of the musculocutaneous nerve is recommended when a surgical procedure takes place in this territory.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialTropisetron plus dexamethasone is more effective than tropisetron alone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in children undergoing tonsillectomy.
The 5-HT3 antagonists are effective in reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) associated with paediatric tonsillectomy. Although prophylactic tropisetron can reduce the incidence of PONV by half, the resulting level of over 40% is still unacceptably high. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding dexamethasone to tropisetron. ⋯ Parents completed a daily diary for 5 days following discharge. Delayed vomiting occurred in 27% and 11% of the tropisetron and combination therapy groups, respectively (P=0.025) Sixteen percent and 9%, respectively, required medical attention (P=0.27). Tropisetron plus dexamethasone is more effective than tropisetron alone in reducing the incidence of PONV following paediatric tonsillectomy.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of ropivacaine 0.1% and 0.2% with bupivacaine 0.2% for single-shot caudal anaesthesia in children.
We compared analgesic efficacy and degree of motor block induced by ropivacaine 0.1% (R 0.1) and 0.2% (R 0.2) vs. bupivacaine 0.2% (B 0. 2) after caudal anaesthesia in children. Total and free plasma concentrations were measured after caudal injection. Duration of caudal analgesia (median/range) was significantly shorter in group R 0.1 (1.7 h/0.2-6 h) than in group R 0.2 (4.5 h/1.7-6 h) or group B 0. 2 (4 h/1-6 h) (P<0.05). ⋯ Peak plasma concentrations after ropivacaine 0.2% were higher and protein binding lower than after bupivacaine 0.2% (P<0.05). We conclude that caudal analgesia with ropivacaine 0.1% is less effective and of shorter duration than that of ropivacaine 0.2%, whereas ropivacaine 0.2% provides pain relief similar to bupivacaine 0.2%. Motor block in the early postoperative period is less with ropivacaine than with bupivacaine.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPretreatment with oral clonidine attenuates cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation in children.
This study was designed to evaluate the effects of diazepam and clonidine orally given preoperatively on cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation in children. Fifty children, ASA physical status I, aged 4-10 years, undergoing minor elective surgery (inguinal hernia, phimosis) received orally, in a randomized, double-blind manner, diazepam 0.4 mg.kg-1 or clonidine 4 microgram.kg-1 (n=25 of each). ⋯ The maximum changes in heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were less in patients who had received clonidine than in those who had received diazepam (HR, 12 vs 24; SBP, 14 vs 26; DBP, 9 vs 16; mean, P < 0.05). In conclusion, compared to diazepam given orally, pretreatment with oral clonidine attenuates haemodynamic changes associated with tracheal extubation in children.
-
Paediatric anaesthesia · Jan 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEmergence agitation in paediatric patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia and no surgery: a comparison with halothane.
This study was designed to compare the emergence characteristics of sevoflurane with halothane anaesthesia in paediatric patients having no surgical intervention. We randomized 32 ASA I or II paediatric outpatients scheduled for magnetic resonance imaging scans to receive either halothane or sevoflurane anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with emergence agitation, as defined by two different criteria. ⋯ Sevoflurane patients had a greater incidence of emergence delirium when a high threshold for agitation was defined (33% vs. 0%, P = 0.010) and a lower threshold for agitation was applied (80% vs. 12%, P<0.0001). Discharge times from the PACU and the SRU were not different. We conclude that there is an increased incidence of emergence agitation with sevoflurane anaesthesia compared to halothane independent of any painful stimulus.